PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate changes in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the meniscal body with acute loading using MRI in osteoarthritic knees and to compare these findings with those of age-matched healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female subjects above 40 years of age with (N1 = 20) and without osteoarthritis (OA) (N2 = 10) were imaged on a 3 Tesla MR scanner using a custom made loading device. MR images were acquired, with the knee flexed at 20°, with and without a compressive load of 50% of the subject's bodyweight. The subjects were categorized based on the radiographic evidence of OA. Three different zones (outer, middle, and inner) of meniscus body were defined (each occupying 1/3rd the width). After adjusting for age and body mass index in the general linear regression model, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect significant differences in T1ρ and T2 with and without loading. RESULTS: In the unloaded condition, the average T1ρ and T2 times were elevated in the outer and middle zones of the medial meniscus in OA subjects compared with the controls. In the loaded condition, T1ρ and T2 times of the outer zone of the medial meniscus was significantly elevated in OA subjects compared with controls. Finally the change (from unloaded to loaded) was significantly higher in controls than OA subjects (15.1% versus 8.3%; P = 0.039 for ΔT1ρ , and 11.5% versus 6.9%, P = 0.049 for ΔT2 ). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that while the OA process appears to affect the relaxation times of all regions within the meniscus, it may affect some regions sooner or to a greater degree. Furthermore, the differences in the change in relaxation times between unloaded and loaded conditions may reveal evidence about load transmission failure of the outer zone of the medial meniscus in subjects with knee OA. It is possible that these metrics (ΔT1ρ and ΔT2 ) may be valuable as an early biomechanical biomarker, which could be used to predict load transmission to the underlying articular cartilage.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate changes in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the meniscal body with acute loading using MRI in osteoarthritic knees and to compare these findings with those of age-matched healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female subjects above 40 years of age with (N1 = 20) and without osteoarthritis (OA) (N2 = 10) were imaged on a 3 Tesla MR scanner using a custom made loading device. MR images were acquired, with the knee flexed at 20°, with and without a compressive load of 50% of the subject's bodyweight. The subjects were categorized based on the radiographic evidence of OA. Three different zones (outer, middle, and inner) of meniscus body were defined (each occupying 1/3rd the width). After adjusting for age and body mass index in the general linear regression model, repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect significant differences in T1ρ and T2 with and without loading. RESULTS: In the unloaded condition, the average T1ρ and T2 times were elevated in the outer and middle zones of the medial meniscus in OA subjects compared with the controls. In the loaded condition, T1ρ and T2 times of the outer zone of the medial meniscus was significantly elevated in OA subjects compared with controls. Finally the change (from unloaded to loaded) was significantly higher in controls than OA subjects (15.1% versus 8.3%; P = 0.039 for ΔT1ρ , and 11.5% versus 6.9%, P = 0.049 for ΔT2 ). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that while the OA process appears to affect the relaxation times of all regions within the meniscus, it may affect some regions sooner or to a greater degree. Furthermore, the differences in the change in relaxation times between unloaded and loaded conditions may reveal evidence about load transmission failure of the outer zone of the medial meniscus in subjects with knee OA. It is possible that these metrics (ΔT1ρ and ΔT2 ) may be valuable as an early biomechanical biomarker, which could be used to predict load transmission to the underlying articular cartilage.
Authors: Christoph Stehling; Richard B Souza; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Bradley T Wyman; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: R B Souza; C Stehling; B T Wyman; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; X Li; T M Link; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Predrag Bursac; Amanda York; Paulette Kuznia; Lauren M Brown; Steven P Arnoczky Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Akshay S Chaudhari; Bragi Sveinsson; Catherine J Moran; Emily J McWalter; Ethan M Johnson; Tao Zhang; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William Fedje-Johnston; Casey P Johnson; Ferenc Tóth; Cathy S Carlson; Arin M Ellingson; Melissa Albersheim; Jack Lewis; Joan Bechtold; Jutta Ellermann; Aaron Rendahl; Marc Tompkins Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 4.379