Literature DB >> 22160143

Nasal septal packing: which one?

Engin Acıoğlu1, Deniz Tuna Edizer, Özgür Yiğit, Fırat Onur, Zeynep Alkan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of four different types of nasal packs on pain, nasal fullness and postoperative bleeding following septoplasty. Prospective randomised double blind study was conducted. The study group included 119 patients who underwent endonasal septoplasty under general anaesthesia. Four types of nasal packing materials were utilized: (1) Merocel standard 8-cm nasal dressing without airway, (2) Doyle Combo splint (DCS), (3) Merocel in a glove finger and (4) Vaseline gauze. All packs were removed at the 48th hour (±3 h) after the surgery. Three different variables were investigated following the surgical procedure: (1) pain, (2) nasal fullness and (3) bleeding after removal of the nasal packing material. DCS produced the greatest pain at the first and sixth postoperative hours. At the first postoperative day, the greatest pain score was reported for Merocel in the glove finger and the least for Merocel. The pain scores during the removal of the nasal packings were highest for Merocel and lowest for Merocel in the glove finger. DCS had the lowest nasal fullness score. Bleeding ratio was highest for Merocel, followed by Vaseline gauze, DCS and Merocel in the glove finger. Many different commercially available packing materials are presently used, each with inherent advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated the pain, nasal fullness and bleeding potential of four nasal packing materials and determined that Merocel had the highest pain potential during removal and the highest rate of bleeding following removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160143     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1842-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

Review 1.  Packing in endonasal surgery.

Authors:  R Weber; R Keerl; F Hochapfel; W Draf; P H Toffel
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Effect of packing on nasal mucosa of sheep.

Authors:  C L Shaw; R B Dymock; A Cowin; P J Wormald
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  D A Nunez; F W Martin
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1991-12

Review 4.  Pain measurement in humans.

Authors:  K S Ong; R A Seymour
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.392

5.  Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery?

Authors:  Richard R Orlandi; Donald C Lanza
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty.

Authors:  M M Ardehali; S Bastaninejad
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  M Bresnihan; B Mehigan; A Curran
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Arya; Omar Butt; Ajay Nigam
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kula; Imdat Yuce; Yasar Unlu; Ahmet Tutus; Sedat Cagli; Ibrahim Ketenci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison of rapid rhino and merocel nasal packs in endonasal septal surgery.

Authors:  Cengiz Ozcan; Yusuf Vayisoglu; Serkan Kiliç; Kemal Görür
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-12
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of antibiotic therapy and nasal packing in septoplasty.

Authors:  Federico Maria Gioacchini; Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Shaniko Kaleci; Giuseppe Magliulo; Massimo Re
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The comparison of the quality of life and intranasal edema between the patients with or without nasal packing after septoplasty.

Authors:  B Kayahan; S Ozer; A E Suslu; O Ogretmenoglu; M Onerci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Optimal time for intranasal splint removal after septoplasty: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Fatih Ozdogan; Halil Erdem Ozel; Erkan Esen; Turgut Yuce; Saban Eyisarac; Selahattin Genc; Adin Selcuk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The usefulness of nasal packing with vaseline gauze and airway silicone splint after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture.

Authors:  Hyo Young Kim; Sin Rak Kim; Jin Hyung Park; Yea Sik Han
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11-14

5.  A new modification of Doyle splint (Hemi-split Doyle) in rhinoplasty with alar base reduction.

Authors:  İlker Koçak; E Şentürk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of the Ankaferd Blood Stopper Tampon and the Merocel Nasal Tampon after Septoplasty Surgery.

Authors:  Murat Kar; Erdem Atalay Cetinkaya; Hande Konşuk-Ünlü
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Nasal packing with Merocel in a glove finger after endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial blowout fracture.

Authors:  Ji Hwan Kim; Jun Yong Lee; Joo-Yeon Lee; Woo Sub Shim; Jee Hye Wee; Hahn Jin Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Risk factors of emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal surgery.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Hyo-Yeol Kim; Jin-Kyoung Kim; Seung-Won Choi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Comparison of Early-period Results of Nasal Splint and Merocel Nasal Packs in Septoplasty.

Authors:  Fatih Bingöl; Ali Budak; Eda Şimşek; Korhan Kılıç; Buket Özel Bingöl
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-16

10.  The Effect of Nasal Packing Removal on Patients Anxiety.

Authors:  Caner Sahin; Hatice Imer Aras
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.