Literature DB >> 27015667

Optimal time for intranasal splint removal after septoplasty: a prospective clinical study.

Fatih Ozdogan1, Halil Erdem Ozel2, Erkan Esen2, Turgut Yuce2, Saban Eyisarac2, Selahattin Genc2, Adin Selcuk2.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of intranasal splint removal time on patient comfort and possible complications after septoplasty. One hundred and nine patients who had septoplasty operations were included in this study. The patients were divided into three groups. In the 1st group (n = 36), splints were removed on the 3rd day after septoplasty; in the 2nd group (n = 36), splints were removed on the 5th day; and in the 3rd group (n = 37), splints were removed on the 7th day. Pain and nasal fullness were evaluated with visual analog scale. Synechia, perforation, hematoma, infection and hemorrhage were recorded after the removal of the splints (postoperative 1, 8 and 24 weeks). For the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd groups, respectively, pain score was 1.96, 2.67, and 2.67; and nasal fullness score was 6.23, 6.04, and 5.48. Nasal synechia was detected in two patients in the 1st group and in one patient in the 2nd group. Early hemorrhage was detected in two patients in the 1st group and one patient in the 3rd group. Infection, septal perforation and hematoma were detected in three patients in the 1st group. There was no difference in hemorrhage, hematoma, synechia and perforation rates between the three groups. There are various opinions in the literature about the ideal removal time of intranasal tampons after septoplasty, but there is no consensus on this topic. Our study shows that removal time of intranasal splints has no effect on patient comfort or possible complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Nasal splint; Septoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27015667     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4004-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Objective usefulness of thin silastic septal splints after septal surgery.

Authors:  Yong Gi Jung; Ji Won Hong; Young-Gyu Eun; Myung-Gu Kim
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  The impact of different nasal packings on postoperative complications.

Authors:  Mahmut Deniz; Zafer Ciftçi; Aklime Işık; Oral Burak Demirel; Erdoğan Gültekin
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Intranasal adhesion formation following surgery for chronic nasal obstruction.

Authors:  A White; J A Murray
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1988-04

4.  Intranasal splints and their effects on intranasal adhesions and septal stability.

Authors:  J A Cook; N J Murrant; K L Evans; R J Lavelle
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-02

5.  Removing intranasal splints after septal surgery.

Authors:  Elif Aksoy; Gediz Murat Serin; Senol Polat; Asm Kaytaz
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Another advantage of the transseptal suture: shortens the duration of waking up after anesthesia.

Authors:  Duran Karataş; Fatih Yüksel; Murat Doğan; Mehmet Sentürk
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty.

Authors:  M M Ardehali; S Bastaninejad
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Deleterious effect of smoking and nasal septal deviation on mucociliary clearance and improvement after septoplasty.

Authors:  Murat Karaman; Arman Tek
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.467

9.  Comparison of nasal packs with transseptal suturing after nasal septal surgery.

Authors:  Mahmut Özkırış; Zeliha Kapusuz; Levent Saydam
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Microbial biofilm formation on silicone nasal splints: optimal time for splint removal.

Authors:  Mustafa Acar; Tolgahan Catli; Ilknur Dag; Turhan San; Cemal Cingi
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.