Literature DB >> 14750352

Double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel with Rapid Rhino nasal packs after routine nasal surgery.

Arvind Kumar Arya1, Omar Butt, Ajay Nigam.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery is commonly practiced in the UK. The most popular pack appears to be Merocel, however this can be associated with significant pain on its removal. AIM: To test the efficacy of a relatively new nasal pack--the Rapid Rhino Goodman pack--introduced to our department, which claims to reduce pain and bleeding after nasal surgery.
METHODS: Fourteen patients undergoing routine nasal surgery were recruited into a randomised controlled trial. One nasal cavity was packed with a Merocel pack and the other with a Rapid Rhino Goodman pack. Patients were asked to record pain levels on each side using a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: We found no difference between packs whilst in-situ, with all patients recording low to moderate pain scores. There were significantly higher pain levels associated with Merocel pack removal than with Rapid Rhino pack removal (average pain scores 5.64 vs 1.64, p < 0.001) and less bleeding overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid Rhino (Goodman pack) is associated with significantly less pain on removal than Merocel pack, causes less bleeding and is not more painful whilst in-situ. We therefore recommend its use in routine nasal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14750352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  10 in total

1.  Nasal septal packing: which one?

Authors:  Engin Acıoğlu; Deniz Tuna Edizer; Özgür Yiğit; Fırat Onur; Zeynep Alkan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A survey of postoperative nasal packing among UK ENT surgeons.

Authors:  Costa Repanos; Stephen E McDonald; Amir H Sadr
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A study to determine the benefits of bilateral versus unilateral nasal packing with Rapid Rhino ® packs.

Authors:  Roland Hettige; Sam Mackeith; Adam Falzon; Mark Draper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The value of intranasal splints after partial inferior turbinectomy.

Authors:  Osama G Abdel-Naby Awad; Khalf A Hamid
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-11-04

5.  A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis.

Authors:  Ioannis Moumoulidis; Mark R Draper; Hemi Patel; Piyush Jani; Timothy Price
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Postoperative pain assessment after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic pansinusitis.

Authors:  Mira Finkensieper; Katharina Poller; Claus Wittekindt; Winfried Meissner; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Use of CMC foam sinus dressing in FESS.

Authors:  Kornel Szczygielski; Piotr Rapiejko; Andrzej Wojdas; Dariusz Jurkiewicz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Merocel versus Nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jianzhang Wang; Changping Cai; Shili Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patterns of hospital admission with epistaxis for 26,725 patients over an 18-year period in Wales, UK.

Authors:  S J C Fishpool; A Tomkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Pawel Krzysztof Burduk; Malgorzata Wierzchowska; Blazej Grześkowiak; Wojciech Kaźmierczak; Katarzyna Wawrzyniak
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.