AIM: We aimed at analyzing the safety of concurrent drug eluting stent (DES)/bare metal stent (BMS) placement in the same target segment using the dataset of the German Drug Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE). METHODS AND RESULTS: In DES.DE a total of 5,296 patients either received concurrent BMS/DES (n = 526; 9.9%) or DES/DES stenting (n = 4,770; 90.1%) in the same target segment (5,407 segments). Patient and clinical characteristics were essentially similar in both groups. ACS was a positive adjusted predictor of BMS/DES concurrent stenting (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.23-1.87) as was age (OR 1.14; 1.04-1.25). Negative predictors were in-stent stenosis (OR 0.49; 0.35-0.68), lesion length >20 mm (OR 0.62; 0.51-0.75), >85% stenosis prior to PCI (OR 0.68; 0.56-0.83) and cardiogenic shock (OR 0.29; 0.09-0.93). The in-hospital mortality in patients receiving BMS/DES concurrent stenting was higher than in those receiving DES/DES placement (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.05-6.49). At the 12 months follow-up there were no statistical differences with respect to mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.55-1.61). However, the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.86; 1.11-3.12) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 1.37; 1.06-1.76) was borderline to significantly higher in BMS/DES patients. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality were age, ACS, cardiogenic shock, renal insufficiency, PAD, heart failure and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent BMS/DES stenting is associated with an increase in in-hospital but not long-term mortality. Further, there was a significant increase in recurrent myocardial infarction and TVR, but absolute differences were low.
AIM: We aimed at analyzing the safety of concurrent drug eluting stent (DES)/bare metal stent (BMS) placement in the same target segment using the dataset of the German Drug Eluting Stent Registry (DES.DE). METHODS AND RESULTS: In DES.DE a total of 5,296 patients either received concurrent BMS/DES (n = 526; 9.9%) or DES/DES stenting (n = 4,770; 90.1%) in the same target segment (5,407 segments). Patient and clinical characteristics were essentially similar in both groups. ACS was a positive adjusted predictor of BMS/DES concurrent stenting (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.23-1.87) as was age (OR 1.14; 1.04-1.25). Negative predictors were in-stent stenosis (OR 0.49; 0.35-0.68), lesion length >20 mm (OR 0.62; 0.51-0.75), >85% stenosis prior to PCI (OR 0.68; 0.56-0.83) and cardiogenic shock (OR 0.29; 0.09-0.93). The in-hospital mortality in patients receiving BMS/DES concurrent stenting was higher than in those receiving DES/DES placement (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.05-6.49). At the 12 months follow-up there were no statistical differences with respect to mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.55-1.61). However, the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction (OR 1.86; 1.11-3.12) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 1.37; 1.06-1.76) was borderline to significantly higher in BMS/DES patients. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality were age, ACS, cardiogenic shock, renal insufficiency, PAD, heart failure and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent BMS/DES stenting is associated with an increase in in-hospital but not long-term mortality. Further, there was a significant increase in recurrent myocardial infarction and TVR, but absolute differences were low.
Authors: Asmir I Syed; Itsik Ben-Dor; Yanlin Li; Sara D Collins; Rebecca Torguson; Kohei Wakabayashi; Manuel A Gonzalez; Gabriel Maluenda; Cedric Delhaye; Loic Belle; Michael A Gaglia; Zhenyi Xue; Kimberly Kaneshige; Nelson Bernardo; Kenneth M Kent; William O Suddath; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph Lindsay; Ron Waksman Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Olivier F Bertrand; Benjamin Faurie; Eric Larose; Can Manh Nguyen; Onil Gleeton; Jean-Pierre Déry; Bernard Noël; Guy Proulx; Louis Roy; Olivier Costerousse; Robert De Larochellière; Josep Rodés-Cabau Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: Gerald S Werner; Gero Schwarz; Dirk Prochnau; Michael Fritzenwanger; Andreas Krack; Stefan Betge; Hans R Figulla Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Timm Bauer; Christoph A Nienaber; Ibrahim Akin; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Thomas Fetsch; Ulrich Tebbe; Stefan N Willich; Jürgen Stumpf; Georg V Sabin; Sigmund Silber; Gert Richardt; Ralf Zahn Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mohammad A Sherif; Christoph A Nienaber; Ralph Toelg; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Volker Geist; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Tebbe; Gert Richardt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Francesco Burzotta; Massimo Siviglia; Luca Altamura; Carlo Trani; Antonio Maria Leone; Enrico Romagnoli; Mario Attilio Mazzari; Rocco Mongiardo; Giampaolo Niccoli; Marta Brancati; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Antonio Giuseppe Rebuzzi; Giovanni Schiavoni; Filippo Crea Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-12-08 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesca Mirabella; Bruno Francaviglia; Davide Capodanno; Maria Elena Di Salvo; Alfredo Ruggero Galassi; Gian Paolo Ussia; Piera Capranzano; Corrado Tamburino Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: I Akin; C A Nienaber; G Richardt; R Tölg; M Hochadel; S Schneider; J Senges; U Tebbe; U Zeymer; G Sabin; K-H Kuck; M W Bergmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Eva S Kehmeier; Wolfgang Lepper; Martina Kropp; Christian Heiss; Ulrike Hendgen-Cotta; Jan Balzer; Mirja Neizel; Christian Meyer; Marc W Merx; Pablo E Verde; Christian Ohmann; Gerd Heusch; Malte Kelm; Tienush Rassaf Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2012-05-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Jens Wiebe; Helge Möllmann; Astrid Most; Oliver Dörr; Kay Weipert; Johannes Rixe; Christoph Liebetrau; Albrecht Elsässer; Stephan Achenbach; Christian Hamm; Holger Nef Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 5.460