Literature DB >> 22159851

Prevalence of pseudotumor in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Daniel H Williams1, Nelson V Greidanus, Bassam A Masri, Clive P Duncan, Donald S Garbuz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cause of recently reported pseudotumor formation in patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements is unknown. It has been postulated that there is an association between elevated levels of serum metal ions and pseudotumor formation. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of pseudotumor formation in asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal total hip replacement after a minimum duration of follow-up of two years. A secondary purpose was to assess whether a correlation exists between elevated serum metal ion levels and pseudotumor formation.
METHODS: In the present study, the prevalence of pseudotumor formation, as detected with ultrasound, was evaluated for thirty-one asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, twenty-four asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty, and twenty asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Serum levels of cobalt and chromium were measured in the metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty groups.
RESULTS: Ten patients (32%) in the metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty group had a solid or cystic mass, with another three patients (10%) having a substantial fluid collection. Five patients (25%) in the hip resurfacing arthroplasty group had a solid or cystic mass, with another patient (5%) having a fluid collection. Pseudotumor formation was significantly more frequent in the metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty group compared with the metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty group (p = 0.015). We did not detect a significant correlation between the serum metal ion levels and the size of pseudotumor abnormality. The median serum metal ion level was greater in patients with pseudotumor formation than it was in those without pseudotumor formation, but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend high-resolution ultrasound surveillance of all asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal implant that is known to result in high serum metal ion levels. Once a metal-on-metal implant is known to be associated with high serum metal ions, the measurement of ion levels does not helpfully contribute to surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159851     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  57 in total

Review 1.  Cystic lesion around the hip joint.

Authors:  Kiminori Yukata; Sho Nakai; Tomohiro Goto; Yuichi Ikeda; Yasunori Shimaoka; Issei Yamanaka; Koichi Sairyo; Jun-Ichi Hamawaki
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Usefulness of metal artifact reduction with WARP technique at 1.5 and 3T MRI in imaging metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael D Ries; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Heavy metal? Recognizing complications of metal on metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Denise M Millstine; Hannah J Hakes; Anita P Mayer; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sulaiman A Almousa; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  What Is the Natural History of Asymptomatic Pseudotumors in Metal-on-metal THAs at Mid-term Followup?

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Clive P Duncan; Bassam S Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.