Literature DB >> 22159748

The impact of teriparatide adherence and persistence on fracture outcomes.

S Yu1, R T Burge, S A Foster, S Gelwicks, E S Meadows.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The study investigated the real-world relationship between teriparatide adherence and persistence and fracture outcomes in a US claims database. Fracture risk was estimated to decrease as adherence and persistence increased for any clinical, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures. Greater emphasis on programs to increase patient adherence may improve clinical outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Adherence to osteoporosis treatment is essential for achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes. Previous findings from clinical trials and observational studies demonstrate that longer teriparatide (TPTD) exposure is associated with fewer fractures. The study aim was to investigate real-world relationships between TPTD adherence and persistence and fracture outcomes.
METHODS: The Thomson Reuters MarketScan® database, 2004-2008, was used to identify TPTD users with continuous enrollment 12 months pre- and 24 months post-TPTD initiation. Post-index fractures included vertebral and non-vertebral. Adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR) groups were defined as high (MPR ≥ 0.80), medium (0.5 ≤ MPR < 0.8), and low (MPR < 0.5). Persistence groups were defined by periods 1-6, 7-12, 13-18, and 19-24 months. Logistic regressions modeled fracture risk for any clinical, hip, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures, controlling for patient characteristics, insurance and healthcare provider types, Charlson comorbidity index, bone mineral density screening, medication use, and fracture history.
RESULTS: Among 3,587 TPTD patients (mean age 68.9 years; 91% female), fracture risk was lowest in high MPR patients in all models except hip (OR = 1.17; p = 0.64). Medium versus high MPR was a significant risk factor for any fracture (OR = 1.49; p = 0.004) and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.45; p = 0.014); low-MPR was a significant risk factor for any fracture (OR = 1.64; p < 0.01), vertebral fracture (OR = 2.56; p = 0.001), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.44; p = 0.013). Persistence of 1-6 months versus 19-24 months was associated with higher risk for any clinical (OR = 1.88, p < 0.001), vertebral (OR = 3.69; p < 0.001), and non-vertebral fracture (OR = 1.51; p = 0.011), but not hip (OR = 1.93; p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture risk decreased as TPTD adherence and persistence increased for any clinical, vertebral, and non-vertebral fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159748     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1843-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  22 in total

1.  Compliance with osteoporosis drug therapy and risk of fracture.

Authors:  D Weycker; D Macarios; J Edelsberg; G Oster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Steven T Harris; Clifford J Rosen; Charles E Barr; James N Arvesen; Thomas A Abbott; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Anti-epileptic medication and bone health.

Authors:  S J Petty; T J O'Brien; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Characteristics of patients initiating teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S A Foster; K A Foley; E S Meadows; J A Johnston; S Wang; G M Pohl; S R Long
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  D M Black; T F Reiss; M C Nevitt; J Cauley; D Karpf; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Fracture outcomes related to persistence and compliance with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Arlene M Gallagher; Stephan Rietbrock; Melvin Olson; Tjeerd P van Staa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy.

Authors:  E Seeman; J Compston; J Adachi; M L Brandi; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes; B Jönsson; H Pols; J A Cramer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Fracture rate and back pain during and after discontinuation of teriparatide: 36-month data from the European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS).

Authors:  A Fahrleitner-Pammer; B L Langdahl; F Marin; F Jakob; D Karras; A Barrett; Ö Ljunggren; J B Walsh; G Rajzbaum; C Barker; W F Lems
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Loss of treatment benefit due to low compliance with bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  F J A Penning-van Beest; J A Erkens; M Olson; R M C Herings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Teriparatide fracture effectiveness in the real world.

Authors:  J H Krege; R T Burge; F Marin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Frequency of discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapies in US patients over 2 years.

Authors:  A Modi; S Sajjan; R Insinga; J Weaver; E M Lewiecki; S T Harris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A systematic review on the use of daily subcutaneous administration of teriparatide for treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture in Asia.

Authors:  J F Chen; K H Yang; Z L Zhang; H C Chang; Y Chen; H Sowa; S Gürbüz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Safety and effectiveness of teriparatide vs alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a prospective non randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Gianfilippo Caggiari; Paolo Tranquilli Leali; Giulia Raffaella Mosele; Leonardo Puddu; Francesca Badessi; Carlo Doria
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Association between teriparatide adherence and healthcare utilization and costs in real-world US kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty patients.

Authors:  Y Zhao; S S Johnston; D M Smith; D McMorrow; K Krohn; J Krege
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The safety and effectiveness profile of daily teriparatide in a prospective observational study in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture: interim report.

Authors:  Takanori Yamamoto; Masanori Taketsuna; Xiaoyan Guo; Masayo Sato; Hideaki Sowa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Differences in persistency with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis according to gender and health care provider.

Authors:  I Kyvernitakis; K Kostev; A Kurth; U S Albert; P Hadji
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Real-world clinical and economic outcomes for daily teriparatide patients in Japan.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Masayo Sato; Tomoko Sugihara
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Association of teriparatide adherence and persistence with clinical and economic outcomes in Medicare Part D recipients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Leslie Hazel-Fernandez; Anthony M Louder; Shonda A Foster; Claudia L Uribe; Russel T Burge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.