| Literature DB >> 28228782 |
Gianfilippo Caggiari1, Paolo Tranquilli Leali1, Giulia Raffaella Mosele1, Leonardo Puddu1, Francesca Badessi2, Carlo Doria1.
Abstract
In this work we study the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide and alendronate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture; it was a double-blinded and it was done by examining the comparisons between teriparatide 20 μg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 355 woman with a mean age of 68 years. Two groups (A and B) with T-score ≤-2.5 at bone mineral density were analyzed and 3 or more vertebral fractures on radiograph. Group A: was treated with teriparatide 20 μg/day and composed from 182 women, in post-menopausal age, without a history of cancer. Group B: was treated with alendronate 10 mg/day composed from 173 women, postmenopausal age, with previous history of cancer (non-active during the study). Clinical evaluations were on bone turnover markers (alkaline phosphatase, procollagene type 1 N-terminal propeptide, and N-telopeptide cross-links), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The results of this study imply that teriparatide comparated with alendronate has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.Entities:
Keywords: alendronate; bone mineral density; osteoporosis; teriparatide; vertebral fracture
Year: 2017 PMID: 28228782 PMCID: PMC5318172 DOI: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab ISSN: 1724-8914