Literature DB >> 22158316

6. Cancers attributable to dietary factors in the UK in 2010. III. Low consumption of fibre.

D M Parkin1, L Boyd.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22158316      PMCID: PMC3252068          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Dietary fibre has long been thought to be associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (Burkitt, 1971). However, analytic epidemiological studies of dietary fibre and the risk of colorectal cancer have not yielded consistent associations. The first comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies showed no significant reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer with high consumption of fibre, but very low fibre intake (less than 10 g per day) did significantly increase bowel cancer risk (Park ). The results of subsequent cohort studies seem to be split between those suggesting a protective effect of fibre (Bingham , 2005; Nomura ; Wakai ) and those showing no benefit (Otani ; Shin ). In some studies, null findings may be due to an insufficient range of fibre intake or other methodological problems; alternatively, other features of a high-fibre diet (a plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables and whole grains) could be responsible for the protective effect. The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) review (2007) concluded that, although there was a clear association, residual confounding could not be excluded as an explanation for the dose–response relationship between risk and fibre intake. In a subsequent study combining data from seven UK cohort studies (Dahm ), fibre intake was ascertained by food diaries (rather than the less reliable food frequency questionnaires used in most studies), and issues of confounding (by anthropometric and socioeconomic factors, and dietary intake of folate, alcohol and energy) were addressed. A clear protective effect of fibre intake was observed, with a risk of colorectal cancer of 0.66 in the highest relative to the lowest quintile of intake. Almost 20 years ago, the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Nutrition Policy (COMA) Panel on Dietary Reference Values proposed that the diet of the UK adult population should contain on average 18 g per day non-starch polysaccharides, with an individual range of 12–24 g per day, from a variety of foods (Department of Health, 1991). This recommendation was repeated in the report of the COMA Working Group on Diet and Cancer (Department of Health, 1998), which had recommended ‘an increase in average intake of non-starch polysaccharide in the adult population from 12 grams per day to 18 grams per day’. A measure of 18 g per day of NSP is equivalent to 23 g of fibre per day. The recommendation published by the Department of Health in ‘Choosing a better diet: a food and action plan’ (Department of Health, 2005) is to ‘increase the average intake of dietary fibre to 18 grams per day (currently 13.8 grams per day)’. Presumably, this actually refers to dietary NSP, for which the average intake in 2000–2001 was 13.8 g (FSA, 2003). In this section, we examine the potential effects of a deficit in consumption of fibre (below the recommended 23 g per day) on the incidence of colorectal cancer in the UK in 2005.

Methods

The relative risk of fibre intake, calculated by WCRF, was 0.9 per 10 g per day increment of dietary fibre (95% confidence interval 0.84–0.97). In the study of Dahm , the value from the fully adjusted model was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.70–1.0). This is equivalent to a decline in risk of 2.9% per gram of fibre, and this value has been chosen for the estimation. The latent period, or interval between ‘exposure’ to fibre and development of cancer, and the appropriate decrease in risk of cancers of the colon and rectum are not known. In the eight cohort studies contributing to the WCRF (2007) meta-analysis, the mean duration of follow-up was about 11 years. Therefore, an interval of 10 years is assumed, and the 2010 fraction of avoidable cancers is based on an estimate of the fibre intake in 2000. Consumption of NSP, as grams per day, by age group and sex, is available for 2000–2001 from the National Diet and Nutrition Surveys (FSA, 2004; Tables 3.14 and 3.15). The relevant data are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Average daily NSP intake (g) by sex and age of respondent, Great Britain 2000–2001

  Percentage of the population by age group
NSP intake 19–24 25–34 35–49 50–64 All
Men (g per day)
 <660212
 6<8108656
 8<10171511812
 10<12915111112
 12<142612141315
 14<162116161115
 16<18511101210
 18<202109119
 20<22135126
 22<2434555
 ⩾240611118
      
Mean
 NSP12.314.615.716.415.2
 Fibre15.718.720.121.019.5
      
Women (g per day)
 <696755
 6<816179512
 8<102716131215
 10<121518181918
 12<141219181617
 14<161310121312
 16<18468108
 18<2034785
 20<2211343
 ⩾2203585
      
Mean
 NSP10.611.612.81412.6
 Fibre13.614.816.417.916.1

Abbreviation: NSP=non-starch polysaccharide.

Data from National Diet and Nutrition Survey, FSA (2004).

The mean daily intake of NSP was significantly lower for women (P<0.01) than for men. The youngest group had significantly lower mean intakes of NSP than those in any other age group. Median values were generally close to the mean within sex and age groups. The three main sources of NSP, accounting for about three-quarters of the dietary intake, were cereals and cereal products (43%), vegetables excluding potatoes (20%), and potatoes and savoury snacks (16%). Within the cereals and cereal products group, whole-grain and high-fibre breakfast cereals provided 11% of the intake and white bread provided a further 9%. There were no significant sex or age differences in the proportion of NSP provided by different food types (Table 2).
Table 2

NSP content of diet, Great Britain 2000–2001

Food items Grams NSP per gram food item Grams NSP per day % NSP intake
Cereals and cereal products 0.0235.9143
 Pasta, rice, miscellaneous cereals0.0060.423
  Pasta0.0100.282
  Other pasta, rice0.0030.141
 Bread0.0282.8220
  White bread0.0191.279
  Wholemeal bread0.0540.846
  Other bread0.0370.705
 Breakfast cereals0.0581.6912
 Other cereal products0.0180.997
    
Meat and meat products0.0050.846
Fish and fish products0.0050.141
    
Vegetables and vegetable dishes (excluding potatoes) 0.0212.8220
 Baked beans0.0350.564
 Other vegetables (not baked beans)0.0192.2516
    
Potatoes and savoury snacks 0.0202.2516
 Potato chips0.0200.705
 Fried/roast potatoes and fried potato products0.0120.141
 Other potatoes0.0170.997
Savoury snacks0.0380.282
Fruit and nuts0.0141.4110
Sugar, preserves, confectionery0.0090.141
Miscellaneousa0.282
Total13.80100

Abbreviation: NSP=non-starch polysaccharide.

Data are from National Diet and Nutrition Survey, Vol. 2, FSA (2004).

Miscellaneous food items include powdered beverages (except tea and coffee), soups, sauces, condiments and artificial sweeteners.

Assuming that 1 g of NSP corresponds to 1.28 g of fibre, the deficit (in grams) from the recommended 23 g per day can be estimated for each row of Table 1. Population-attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated for each sex–age group in Table 2 according to the usual formula: where p is the proportion of population in consumption category x and ERR is the excess relative risk in consumption category x. ERR is calculated as follows: where R is the increase in risk for a deficit of 1 g per day of fibre (0.029) and G is the deficit in consumption (<23 g per day) in consumption category .

Results

Table 3 shows the estimated PAF and the number of cases of colorectal cancer ‘caused’ in 2010 by the deficit in consumption of fibre in 2000, by age group and sex. The excess number of cases is also expressed in terms of cancer as a whole. About 12.2% of colorectal cancer, or 1.5% of all cancers in 2010, is due to fibre consumption falling below the recommended daily intake of an average of 23 g (or 18 g NSP).
Table 3

Projected number of colorectal and all cancer cases in UK in 2010 and proportion due to deficient intake of NSP

Age (years)
Colorectal cancer
All cancera
At exposure At outcome Observed cases Excess attributable cases PAF (%) Observed cases Excess attributable cases PAF (%)
Men
 19–2429–34921415.11333141.0
 25–3435–443974210.64124421.0
 35–4945–5929212769.522 3882761.2
 50–64⩾6018 643193210.4128 19219321.5
 All ages22 127226410.2158 66722641.4
        
Women
19–2429–34971919.52248190.8
25–3435–444028220.58619821.0
35–4945–59229236415.931 6313641.1
50–64⩾6014 926212714.2110 40321271.9
 All ages17 787259214.6155 58425921.7
        
Persons
19–2429–341893317.35096330.6
25–3435–4479912415.618 7041240.7
35–4945–59521364012.373 3216400.9
50–64⩾6033 569405912.1183 74540592.2
 All ages39 914485612.2314 25148561.5

Abbreviations: NSP=non-starch polysaccharide; PAF=population-attributable fraction.

Excluding non-melanoma skin cancer.

As discussed in Section 4 of this supplement (Parkin and Boyd, 2011), the benefit of consumption of fruits and vegetables on the risk of colorectal cancer may be, in part, due to their content of fibre. In calculating the cancer cases attributable to a deficient intake of dietary fruit and vegetables, the increased consumption that would have been necessary to achieve the ‘5-a-day’ target (equivalent to 400 g of fruit and vegetable intake daily) was estimated. On the basis of the content of NSP in fruits and vegetables (in 2000–2001), we may estimate the additional consumption of fibre that is implied (Table 4). The increase is considerable – on average 4.1 g per day of fibre for men and 3.8 for women. With this addition to the distribution of fibre intake shown in Table 1, the mean intake (for all age groups 19–64) would be 23.6 g per day fibre for men, with only 30% consuming less than 23 g per day, and 16.4 g per day for women, with 58% consuming less than 23 g per day.
Table 4

Estimated additional consumption of fibre from increasing fruit and vegetable intake to 400 g per day from the levels observed in 2000–2001

  Increase in fibre consumption (g per day) by age group
  19–24 25–34 35–49 50–64 All ages
Males7.95.53.92.74.1
Females6.83.83.92.43.8
In Table 5, the numbers of cancer cases that would have been avoided by a diet containing 400 g per day of fruit and vegetable intake is presented, assuming that the benefit is due to the reduction in risk from the fibre content. Overall, the increase in dietary fibre intake from increasing the intake of fruits and vegetables to 400 g per day is estimated to reduce colorectal cancer by ∼4.9% (4.4% in men and 5.5% in women). This is about two-fifths of the total benefit achievable from increasing the intake of fibre to 23 g per day, for those consuming less than this.
Table 5

Projected number and proportion of colorectal cancer cases avoidable in 2010 from the fibre intake associated with five servings (400 g) of fruit and vegetables daily

   Colorectal cancer
Age (years)
  Reduction in cases
At exposure At outcome Observed cases Number %
Men
 19–2429–34921111.7
 25–3435–44397317.7
 35–4945–5929211635.6
 50–64⩾6018 6437714.1
 All ages22 1279754.4
     
Women
 19–2429–34971313.4
 25–3435–44402348.4
 35–4945–5922921848.0
 50–64⩾6014 9267485.0
 All ages17 7879785.5
     
Persons
 19–2429–341892412.6
 25–3435–44799648.1
 35–4945–5952133466.6
 50–64⩾6033 56915194.5
 All ages39 91419544.9

Discussion

In the analysis presented here, we examine both the possible number of colorectal cancers due to a deficit in consumption of fibre less than the recommended 23 g per day and the effect of a deficit in consumption of fruit and vegetables (below the recommended ‘5 a day’), assuming that the benefit of fruit and vegetables is solely the result of their fibre content. The latter depends not only on the supposition that fibre is indeed protective against colorectal cancer, but also on the assumption that all forms of fibre are equally protective. This is not universally accepted; in the study by Schatzkin , for example, only fibre from grains was associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer. The UK-recommended average intake of NSP in the adult population is 18 g per day (equivalent to 23 g per day of fibre). The WCRF (2007) set a much more ambitious public health goal, as ‘a population average of at least 25 grams non-starch polysaccharide daily’ (equivalent to 32 g of dietary fibre). In their estimates of ‘preventability’ of colorectal cancer in the UK in 2002 (WCRF, 2009), an estimated 12% of colorectal cancer was stated as preventable by increasing fibre intake to 30 g per day, based on the effects estimated by Park : a relative risk of 1.14 for an intake of ⩽10 g per day relative to ⩾30 g per day. Although there is no direct evidence from intervention studies of the effect of dietary and supplemental fibre on colorectal cancer, several trials have been carried out on the effects of fibre supplements on recurrence of colonic adenomas. The results as reported were negative (Maclennan ; Alberts ; Schatzkin ), although the period of supplementation and follow-up was very short (2–4 years). A pooled reanalysis of the two US trials showed a statistically significant interaction by sex, and a beneficial effect of the intervention in men (odds ratio=0.81, 95% CI=0.67–0.98; Jacobs ). See acknowledgements on page Si.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional aspects of the development of cancer. Report of the Working Group on Diet and Cancer of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond)       Date:  1998

2.  Dietary intake of calcium, fiber and other micronutrients in relation to colorectal cancer risk: Results from the Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Aesun Shin; Honglan Li; Xiao-Ou Shu; Gong Yang; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network.

Authors:  D S Alberts; M E Martínez; D J Roe; J M Guillén-Rodríguez; J R Marshall; J B van Leeuwen; M E Reid; C Ritenbaugh; P A Vargas; A B Bhattacharyya; D L Earnest; R E Sampliner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; E Lanza; D Corle; P Lance; F Iber; B Caan; M Shike; J Weissfeld; R Burt; M R Cooper; J W Kikendall; J Cahill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Dietary fiber intake and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer: the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Otani; Motoki Iwasaki; Junko Ishihara; Shizuka Sasazuki; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Epidemiology of cancer of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  D P Burkitt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Dietary fiber intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Yikyung Park; David J Hunter; Donna Spiegelman; Leif Bergkvist; Franco Berrino; Piet A van den Brandt; Julie E Buring; Graham A Colditz; Jo L Freudenheim; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Saxon Graham; Lisa Harnack; Anne M Hartman; David R Jacobs; Ikuko Kato; Vittorio Krogh; Michael F Leitzmann; Marjorie L McCullough; Anthony B Miller; Pirjo Pietinen; Thomas E Rohan; Arthur Schatzkin; Walter C Willett; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Shumin M Zhang; Stephanie A Smith-Warner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Is the association with fiber from foods in colorectal cancer confounded by folate intake?

Authors:  Sheila A Bingham; Teresa Norat; Aurelie Moskal; Pietro Ferrari; Nadia Slimani; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Emmanuelle Kesse; Alexandra Nieters; Heiner Boeing; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; Carmen Martinez; Miren Dorronsoro; Carlos A González; Eva Ardanaz; Carmen Navarro; José R Quirós; Timothy J Key; Nicholas E Day; Antonia Trichopoulou; Androniki Naska; Vittorio Krogh; Rosario Tumino; Domenico Palli; Salvatore Panico; Paolo Vineis; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; Marga C Ocké; Petra H M Peeters; Göran Berglund; Göran Hallmans; Eiliv Lund; Guri Skeie; Rudolf Kaaks; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Randomized trial of intake of fat, fiber, and beta carotene to prevent colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  R MacLennan; F Macrae; C Bain; D Battistutta; P Chapuis; H Gratten; J Lambert; R C Newland; M Ngu; A Russell; M Ward; M L Wahlqvist
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Fiber, sex, and colorectal adenoma: results of a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Jacobs; Elaine Lanza; David S Alberts; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Ruiyun Jiang; Arthur Schatzkin; Patricia A Thompson; María Elena Martínez
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cancer incidence attributable to insufficient fibre consumption in Alberta in 2012.

Authors:  Anne Grundy; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Alison McFadden; Christine M Friedenreich; Darren R Brenner
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-01-04

2.  Cancers Due to Excess Weight, Low Physical Activity, and Unhealthy Diet.

Authors:  Gundula Behrens; Thomas Gredner; Christian Stock; Michael F Leitzmann; Hermann Brenner; Ute Mons
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  A methodologic framework to evaluate the number of cancers attributable to lifestyle and environment in Alberta.

Authors:  Anne Grundy; Christine M Friedenreich; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Darren R Brenner
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-09-15

4.  Cancer incidence attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in Alberta in 2012: summary of results.

Authors:  Anne Grundy; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Xin Grevers; Christine M Friedenreich; Darren R Brenner
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-07-07

5.  Cancers in Australia in 2010 attributable to inadequate consumption of fruit, non-starchy vegetables and dietary fibre.

Authors:  Christina M Nagle; Louise F Wilson; Maria Celia B Hughes; Torukiri I Ibiebele; Kyoko Miura; Christopher J Bain; David C Whiteman; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 6.  Preventable causes of cancer in Texas by Race/Ethnicity: Inadequate diet.

Authors:  Franciska J Gudenkauf; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-11-17

7.  Familial risk of early and late onset cancer: nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E Kharazmi; M Fallah; K Sundquist; K Hemminki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.