Literature DB >> 22157953

Accuracy of respiratory rate monitoring by capnometry using the Capnomask(R) in extubated patients receiving supplemental oxygen after surgery.

A Gaucher1, D Frasca, O Mimoz, B Debaene.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory monitoring is standard after anaesthesia and surgery. Abnormal respiratory rate is a sensitive indicator of respiratory problems, even in patients receiving supplemental oxygen, but the best method for its continuous measurement in spontaneously breathing patients is unclear. This study compared respiratory rate assessment by capnometry using a new oxygen mask with a carbon dioxide sampling port (Capnomask(®)) and thoracic impedance pneumography with clinical measurement (used as a reference method) in extubated patients receiving supplemental oxygen.
METHODS: Adult males admitted to the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia were studied. Immediately after extubation, a Capnomask(®) connected to a capnometer was positioned appropriately. Respiratory rate was measured by visual inspection of chest movement for 1 min, by capnometry, and thoracic impedance pneumography. One set of measurements was obtained for every patient receiving supplemental oxygen at different flow rates.
RESULTS: Twenty men, mean (inter-quartile range) age 54 (23-66) yr and BMI 25 (21-31) kg m(-2), were studied. Compared with visual inspection, the bias and limits of agreement were 0.0 (1.0 to -1.0) bpm for the Capnomask(®) and -2.2 (2.0 to -6.5) bpm for the impedance pneumography. The accuracy of respiratory rate assessment using Capnomask(®) was not influenced by the supplemental oxygen flow rate.
CONCLUSIONS: In extubated patients, continuous assessment of respiratory rate with the Capnomask(®) is more accurate than by thoracic impedance pneumography even when supplemental oxygen is delivered at a high flow rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22157953     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  18 in total

1.  Acoustic sensor versus electrocardiographically derived respiratory rate in unstable trauma patients.

Authors:  Shiming Yang; Ashley Menne; Peter Hu; Lynn Stansbury; Cheng Gao; Nicolas Dorsey; William Chiu; Stacy Shackelford; Colin Mackenzie
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Long-term tolerability of capnography and respiratory inductance plethysmography for respiratory monitoring in pediatric patients treated with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Karen M Miller; Andrew Y Kim; Myron Yaster; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Elizabeth White; James Fackler; Constance L Monitto
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.556

3.  Assessment of noninvasive acoustic respiration rate monitoring in patients admitted to an Emergency Department for drug or alcoholic poisoning.

Authors:  Youcef Guechi; Amélie Pichot; Denis Frasca; Fatima Rayeh-Pelardy; Jean-Yves Lardeur; Olivier Mimoz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Acoustic method respiratory rate monitoring is useful in patients under intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Kentaro Ouchi; Shigeki Fujiwara; Kazuna Sugiyama
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  The prognostic significance of respiratory rate in patients with pneumonia: a retrospective analysis of data from 705,928 hospitalized patients in Germany from 2010-2012.

Authors:  Richard Strauß; Santiago Ewig; Klaus Richter; Thomas König; Günther Heller; Torsten T Bauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Linshom thermodynamic sensor is a reliable alternative to capnography for monitoring respiratory rate.

Authors:  David Preiss; Benjamin A Drew; James Gosnell; Bhavani S Kodali; James H Philip; Richard D Urman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Influences of environmental noise level and respiration rate on the accuracy of acoustic respiration rate monitoring.

Authors:  Shizuha Yabuki; Hiroaki Toyama; Yusuke Takei; Toshihiro Wagatsuma; Hiroshi Yabuki; Masanori Yamauchi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Preclinical evaluation of noncontact vital signs monitoring using real-time IR-UWB radar and factors affecting its accuracy.

Authors:  Jun-Young Park; Yonggu Lee; Ran Heo; Hyun-Kyung Park; Seok-Hyun Cho; Sung Ho Cho; Young-Hyo Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Determination of saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate at forearm using a Nellcor™ forehead SpO2-saturation sensor.

Authors:  Jarkko Harju; Antti Vehkaoja; Ville Lindroos; Pekka Kumpulainen; Sasu Liuhanen; Arvi Yli-Hankala; Niku Oksala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Evaluation of respiratory rate monitoring using a microwave Doppler sensor mounted on the ceiling of an intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tanaka; Masashi Yokose; Shunsuke Takaki; Takahiro Mihara; Yusuke Saigusa; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.