Literature DB >> 28229352

Linshom thermodynamic sensor is a reliable alternative to capnography for monitoring respiratory rate.

David Preiss1, Benjamin A Drew2, James Gosnell1, Bhavani S Kodali1, James H Philip1, Richard D Urman3,4.   

Abstract

Monitoring ventilation accurately is a technically challenging, yet indispensable aspect of patient care in the intra- and post-procedural settings. A new prototypical device known as the Linshom Respiratory Monitoring Device (LRMD) has been recently designed to non-invasively, inexpensively, and portably measure respiratory rate. The purpose of this study was to measure the accuracy and variability of LRMD measurements of respiratory rate relative to the measurement of capnography. In this prospective study, participants were enrolled and individually fitted with a face mask monitored by the LRMD and capnography. With a baseline oxygen flow rate and digital metronome to pace their respiratory rate, the participants were instructed to breathe at 10 breaths per minute (bpm) for 3 min, 20 bpm for 3 min, 30 bpm for 3 min, 0 bpm for 30 s, and resume regular breathing for 30 s. Both sensors were connected to a computer for continuous temperature and carbon dioxide waveform recordings. The data were then retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-six healthy volunteers, mean (range) age 27.8 (23-37) and mean (range) BMI 23.1 (18.8-29.2) kg/m2 were recruited. There were 15 males (57.7%) and 11 females (42.3%). After excluding 3 subjects for technical reasons, 13,800 s of breathing and 4,140 expiratory breaths were recorded. Throughout the protocol, the average standard deviation (SD) for the LRMD and capnography was 1.11 and 1.81 bpm, respectively. The overall mean bias (±2SD) between LRMD and capnography was -0.33 (±0.1.56) bpm. At the lowest and intermediate breathing rates reflective of hypoventilation and normal ventilation, the LRMD variance was 0.55 and 1.23 respectively, compared to capnography with 5.54 and 7.47, respectively. At higher breathing rates indicative of hyperventilation, the variance of the test device was 4.52, still less than that of capnography at 5.73. This study demonstrated a promising correlation between the LRMD and capnography for use as a respiratory rate monitor. The LRMD technology may be a significant addition to monitoring vital signs because it offers a minimally intrusive opportunity to detect respiratory rate and apnea, without expensive or complex anesthetic equipment, before the need for life-saving resuscitation arises.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apnea; End-tidal carbon dioxide; Monitoring; Post-operative; Respiratory rate; Ventilation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28229352     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0004-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  32 in total

1.  Tidal breathing parameters in young children: comparison of measurement by respiratory inductance plethysmography to a facemask pneumotachograph system.

Authors:  T Manczur; A Greenough; R Hooper; K Allen; S Latham; J F Price; G F Rafferty
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1999-12

2.  Evaluation of a new fibre-optical monitor for respiratory rate monitoring.

Authors:  C Larsson; P Staun
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology.

Authors:  Jannicke Mellin-Olsen; Sven Staender; David K Whitaker; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  V A Lawrence; S G Hilsenbeck; C D Mulrow; R Dhanda; J Sapp; C P Page
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Subjective and objective measurement of tidal volume in critically ill patients.

Authors:  B J Semmes; M J Tobin; J V Snyder; A Grenvik
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Kimberly Bertsch; Jeremy Man; John Bradley; Michael Jacka
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Postoperative day one: a high risk period for respiratory events.

Authors:  Shiv Taylor; Orlando C Kirton; Ilene Staff; Robert A Kozol
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  A new respiratory rate monitor: development and initial clinical experience.

Authors:  B Hök; L Wiklund; S Henneberg
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1993-05

9.  The accuracy, precision and reliability of measuring ventilatory rate and detecting ventilatory pause by rainbow acoustic monitoring and capnometry.

Authors:  Michael A E Ramsay; Mohammad Usman; Elaine Lagow; Minerva Mendoza; Emylene Untalan; Edward De Vol
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Wireless non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring with FMCW radar: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  K van Loon; M J M Breteler; L van Wolfwinkel; A T Rheineck Leyssius; S Kossen; C J Kalkman; B van Zaane; L M Peelen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.502

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A call to alarms: Current state and future directions in the battle against alarm fatigue.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Tiffany Pellathy; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Anthony Wertz; Gilles Clermont; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Novel device for monitoring respiratory rate during endoscopy-A thermodynamic sensor.

Authors:  Vaibhav Wadhwa; Adalberto J Gonzalez; Kristen Selema; Ronen Feldman; Rocio Lopez; John J Vargo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.