Literature DB >> 22157775

Modeling physical activity outcomes from wearable monitors.

Daniel P Heil1, Soren Brage, Megan P Rothney.   

Abstract

Although the measurement of physical activity with wearable monitors may be considered objective, consensus guidelines for collecting and processing these objective data are lacking. This article presents an algorithm embodying best practice recommendations for collecting, processing, and reporting physical activity data routinely collected with accelerometry-based activity monitors. This algorithm is proposed as a linear series of seven steps within three successive phases. The Precollection Phase includes two steps. Step 1 defines the population of interest, the type and intensity of physical activity behaviors to be targeted, and the preferred outcome variables, and identifies the epoch duration. In Step 2, the activity monitor is selected, and decisions about how long and where on the body the monitor is to be worn are made. The Data Collection Phase, Step 3, consists of collecting and processing activity monitor data and is dependent on decisions made previously. The Postcollection Phase consists of four steps. Step 4 involves quality and quantity control checks of the activity monitor data. In Step 5, the raw data are transformed into physiologically meaningful units using a calibration algorithm. Step 6 involves summarizing these data according to the target behavior. In Step 7, physical activity outcome variables based on time, energy expenditure, or movement type are generated. Best practice recommendations include the full disclosure of each step within the algorithm when reporting monitor-derived physical activity outcome variables in the research literature. As such, those reading and publishing within the research literature, as well as future users, will have the best chance for understanding the interactions between study methodology and activity monitor selection, as well as the best possibility for relating their own monitor-derived physical activity outcome variables to the research literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22157775     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399dcc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  38 in total

1.  How do they do it: working women meeting physical activity recommendations.

Authors:  Nancy M Gell; Danielle D Wadsworth
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Harnessing the Potential of Wearable Activity Trackers for Heart Failure Self-Care.

Authors:  Muaddi Alharbi; Nicola Straiton; Robyn Gallagher
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-02

3.  Is missing geographic positioning system data in accelerometry studies a problem, and is imputation the solution?

Authors:  Kristin Meseck; Marta M Jankowska; Jasper Schipperijn; Loki Natarajan; Suneeta Godbole; Jordan Carlson; Michelle Takemoto; Katie Crist; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  Geospat Health       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.212

4.  Linking patients with community resources: use of a free YMCA membership among low-income black women.

Authors:  Mary L Greaney; Sandy Askew; Perry Foley; Sherrie F Wallington; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field.

Authors:  Patty Freedson; Heather R Bowles; Richard Troiano; William Haskell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  Physical activity assessment tools for use in overweight and obese children.

Authors:  C V L Ellery; H A Weiler; T J Hazell
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 7.  Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges.

Authors:  I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in US Hispanic/Latino Adults: The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).

Authors:  Qibin Qi; Garrett Strizich; Gina Merchant; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Christina Buelna; Sheila F Castañeda; Linda C Gallo; Jianwen Cai; Marc D Gellman; Carmen R Isasi; Ashley E Moncrieft; Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen; Neil Schneiderman; Robert C Kaplan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Physical Activity, Decision-Making Abilities, and Eating Disturbances in Pre- and Postbariatric Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Merle Bartsch; Svenja Langenberg; Kerstin Gruner-Labitzke; Mareike Schulze; Hinrich Köhler; Ross D Crosby; Michael Marschollek; Martina de Zwaan; Astrid Müller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Feasibility and acceptability of intensive, real-time biobehavioral data collection using ecological momentary assessment, salivary biomarkers, and accelerometers among middle-aged African Americans.

Authors:  Soohyun Nam; Genevieve F Dunton; Monica R Ordway; Garrett I Ash; Sangchoon Jeon; David Vlahov; Robin Whittemore; LaRon E Nelson; Rajita Sinha; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Douglas A Granger
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.