Literature DB >> 22157771

New horizons in sensor development.

Stephen S Intille1, Jonathan Lester, James F Sallis, Glen Duncan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accelerometry and other sensing technologies are important tools for physical activity measurement. Engineering advances have allowed developers to transform clunky, uncomfortable, and conspicuous monitors into relatively small, ergonomic, and convenient research tools. New devices can be used to collect data on overall physical activity and, in some cases, posture, physiological state, and location, for many days or weeks from subjects during their everyday lives. In this review article, we identify emerging trends in several types of monitoring technologies and gaps in the current state of knowledge. BEST PRACTICES: The only certainty about the future of activity-sensing technologies is that researchers must anticipate and plan for change. We propose a set of best practices that may accelerate adoption of new devices and increase the likelihood that data being collected and used today will be compatible with new data sets and methods likely to appear on the horizon. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: We describe several technology-driven trends, ranging from continued miniaturization of devices that provide gross summary information about activity levels and energy expenditure to new devices that provide highly detailed information about the specific type, amount, and location of physical activity. Some devices will take advantage of consumer technologies, such as mobile phones, to detect and respond to physical activity in real time, creating new opportunities in measurement, remote compliance monitoring, data-driven discovery, and intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22157771      PMCID: PMC3245518          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399c7d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  11 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems.

Authors:  Ruth E Mayagoitia; Anand V Nene; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations.

Authors:  Juul Achten; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Measurement of human daily physical activity.

Authors:  Kuan Zhang; Patricia Werner; Ming Sun; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Carol N Boozer
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-01

5.  A Bayesian change-point analysis of electromyographic data: detecting muscle activation patterns and associated applications.

Authors:  Timothy D Johnson; Robert M Elashoff; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations.

Authors:  Dianne S Ward; Kelly R Evenson; Amber Vaughn; Anne Brown Rodgers; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future.

Authors:  Kong Y Chen; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers.

Authors:  David M Pober; John Staudenmayer; Christopher Raphael; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Recognition of dietary activity events using on-body sensors.

Authors:  Oliver Amft; Gerhard Tröster
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  Work group II: Using Geographic Information Systems for enhancing research relevant to policy on diet, physical activity, and weight.

Authors:  Stephen A Matthews; Anne Vernez Moudon; Mark Daniel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Stimulating innovations in the measurement of parenting constructs.

Authors:  Louise C Mâsse; Allison W Watts
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  Evaluation of the ability of three physical activity monitors to predict weight change and estimate energy expenditure.

Authors:  John B Correa; John W Apolzan; Desti N Shepard; Daniel P Heil; Jennifer C Rood; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.665

3.  Establishing and evaluating wrist cutpoints for the GENEActiv accelerometer in youth.

Authors:  Christine A Schaefer; Claudio R Nigg; James O Hill; Lois A Brink; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Advances and Controversies in Diet and Physical Activity Measurement in Youth.

Authors:  Donna Spruijt-Metz; Cheng K Fred Wen; Brooke M Bell; Stephen Intille; Jeannie S Huang; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; James J McClain; Robert J Brychta; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field.

Authors:  Patty Freedson; Heather R Bowles; Richard Troiano; William Haskell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer.

Authors:  Whitney A Welch; David R Bassett; Dixie L Thompson; Patty S Freedson; John W Staudenmayer; Dinesh John; Jeremy A Steeves; Scott A Conger; Tyrone Ceaser; Cheryl A Howe; Jeffer E Sasaki; Eugene C Fitzhugh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 8.  Review of self-reported physical activity assessments for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber; Danielle Symons Downs; Emily E Pearce
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  A method to estimate free-living active and sedentary behavior from an accelerometer.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Sarah Kozey Keadle; John Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 10.  Personalized Technologies in Chronic Gastrointestinal Disorders: Self-monitoring and Remote Sensor Technologies.

Authors:  Muhammad Safwan Riaz; Ashish Atreja
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.