Literature DB >> 22157312

On using summary statistics from an external calibration sample to correct for covariate measurement error.

Ying Guo1, Roderick J Little, Daniel S McConnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded.
METHODS: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution.
RESULTS: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22157312     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823a4386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  13 in total

1.  An imputation-based solution to using mismeasured covariates in propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Yenny Webb-Vargas; Kara E Rudolph; David Lenis; Peter Murakami; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Regression calibration is valid when properly applied.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liao; Donna Spiegelman; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Measurement error correction and sensitivity analysis in longitudinal dietary intervention studies using an external validation study.

Authors:  Juned Siddique; Michael J Daniels; Raymond J Carroll; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Elizabeth A Stuart; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Bryan Lau; Alden L Gross; Derek K Ng; Alison G Abraham
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Within-person reproducibility of red blood cell mercury over a 10- to 15-year period among women in the Nurses' Health Study II.

Authors:  Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Andrea L Roberts; Flemming Nielsen; Shelley S Tworoger; Philippe Grandjean; Marc G Weisskopf
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Methods to adjust for misclassification in the quantiles for the generalized linear model with measurement error in continuous exposures.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Jean De Dieu Tapsoba; Catherine Duggan; Kristin L Campbell; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Stochastic imputation for integrated transcriptome association analysis of a longitudinally measured trait.

Authors:  Evan L Ray; Jing Qian; Regina Brecha; Muredach P Reilly; Andrea S Foulkes
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Bias Reduction Methods for Propensity Scores Estimated from Error-Prone EHR-Derived Covariates.

Authors:  Joanna Harton; Ronac Mamtani; Nandita Mitra; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2020-09-10

10.  Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: a pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies.

Authors:  Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Donna Spiegelman; Adam A Szpiro; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman; Jeff D Yanosky; Ronald Williams; Francine Laden; Biling Hong; Helen Suh
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.