BACKGROUND: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded. METHODS: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution. RESULTS: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study. CONCLUSIONS: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency.
BACKGROUND: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded. METHODS: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution. RESULTS: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study. CONCLUSIONS: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency.
Authors: Yenny Webb-Vargas; Kara E Rudolph; David Lenis; Peter Murakami; Elizabeth A Stuart Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Juned Siddique; Michael J Daniels; Raymond J Carroll; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Elizabeth A Stuart; Laurence S Freedman Journal: Biometrics Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Gabriel K Innes; Fiona Bhondoekhan; Bryan Lau; Alden L Gross; Derek K Ng; Alison G Abraham Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Andrea L Roberts; Flemming Nielsen; Shelley S Tworoger; Philippe Grandjean; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman Journal: Stat Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Ching-Yun Wang; Jean De Dieu Tapsoba; Catherine Duggan; Kristin L Campbell; Anne McTiernan Journal: Stat Med Date: 2015-11-22 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Donna Spiegelman; Adam A Szpiro; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman; Jeff D Yanosky; Ronald Williams; Francine Laden; Biling Hong; Helen Suh Journal: Environ Health Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 5.984