Literature DB >> 34664648

The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology.

Gabriel K Innes, Fiona Bhondoekhan, Bryan Lau, Alden L Gross, Derek K Ng, Alison G Abraham.   

Abstract

Measurement error, although ubiquitous, is uncommonly acknowledged and rarely assessed or corrected in epidemiologic studies. This review offers a straightforward guide to common problems caused by measurement error in research studies and a review of several accessible bias-correction methods for epidemiologists and data analysts. Although most correction methods require criterion validation including a gold standard, there are also ways to evaluate the impact of measurement error and potentially correct for it without such data. Technical difficulty ranges from simple algebra to more complex algorithms that require expertise, fine tuning, and computational power. However, at all skill levels, software packages and methods are available and can be used to understand the threat to inferences that arises from imperfect measurements.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias correction; epidemiologic methods; epidemiologic review; measurement error; sensitivity analyses

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34664648      PMCID: PMC9005058          DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxab011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Rev        ISSN: 0193-936X            Impact factor:   4.280


  56 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk.

Authors:  K T Copeland; H Checkoway; A J McMichael; R H Holbrook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process.

Authors:  Matthew P Fox; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.

Authors:  Thomas J Dunn; Thom Baguley; Vivienne Brunsden
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-08-06

5.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Comparing methods of misclassification correction for studies of adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Melvin D Livingston; Brad Cannell; Keith Muller; Kelli A Komro
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.829

7.  Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers.

Authors:  Shruti H Mehta; Bryan Lau; Nezam H Afdhal; David L Thomas
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.

Authors:  S L Zeger; D Thomas; F Dominici; J M Samet; J Schwartz; D Dockery; A Cohen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective.

Authors:  K Luijken; R H H Groenwold; B Van Calster; E W Steyerberg; M van Smeden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Assessing Discriminative Performance at External Validation of Clinical Prediction Models.

Authors:  Daan Nieboer; Tjeerd van der Ploeg; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.