Literature DB >> 26593772

Methods to adjust for misclassification in the quantiles for the generalized linear model with measurement error in continuous exposures.

Ching-Yun Wang1, Jean De Dieu Tapsoba1, Catherine Duggan1, Kristin L Campbell2, Anne McTiernan1.   

Abstract

In many biomedical studies, covariates of interest may be measured with errors. However, frequently in a regression analysis, the quantiles of the exposure variable are often used as the covariates in the regression analysis. Because of measurement errors in the continuous exposure variable, there could be misclassification in the quantiles for the exposure variable. Misclassification in the quantiles could lead to bias estimation in the association between the exposure variable and the outcome variable. Adjustment for misclassification will be challenging when the gold standard variables are not available. In this paper, we develop two regression calibration estimators to reduce bias in effect estimation. The first estimator is normal likelihood-based. The second estimator is linearization-based, and it provides a simple and practical correction. Finite sample performance is examined via a simulation study. We apply the methods to a four-arm randomized clinical trial that tested exercise and weight loss interventions in women aged 50-75 years.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  measurement error; misclassification; regression calibration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26593772      PMCID: PMC4826813          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  Evaluating the exposure and disease relationship with adjustment for different types of exposure misclassification: a regression approach.

Authors:  A S Kosinski; W D Flanders
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparing the effects of continuous and discrete covariate mismeasurement, with emphasis on the dichotomization of mismeasured predictors.

Authors:  Paul Gustafson; D Le Nhu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A note on estimating crude odds ratios in case-control studies with differentially misclassified exposure.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.

Authors:  C Y Wang; Yijian Huang; Edward C Chao; Marjorie K Jeffcoat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.

Authors:  K M Flegal; P M Keyl; F J Nieto
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Correction for misclassification of a categorized exposure in binary regression using replication data.

Authors:  Ingvild Dalen; John P Buonaccorsi; Joseph A Sexton; Petter Laake; Magne Thoresen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Joint inference on HIV viral dynamics and immune suppression in presence of measurement errors.

Authors:  L Wu; W Liu; X J Hu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Expected estimating equations via EM for proportional hazards regression with covariate misclassification.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Xiao Song
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.899

9.  Markers of inflammation are inversely associated with VO2 max in asymptomatic men.

Authors:  Iftikhar J Kullo; Mahyar Khaleghi; Donald D Hensrud
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-12-14

Review 10.  Maximal oxygen intake and independence in old age.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  1 in total

1.  A smoothed corrected score approach for proportional hazards model with misclassified discretized covariates induced by error-contaminated continuous time-dependent exposure.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Edward C Chao; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.701

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.