BACKGROUND: Beach sand can harbor fecal indicator organisms and pathogens, but enteric illness risk associated with sand contact remains unclear. METHODS: In 2007, visitors at 2 recreational marine beaches were asked on the day of their visit about sand contact. Ten to 12 days later, participants answered questions about health symptoms since the visit. F+ coliphage, Enterococcus, Bacteroidales, fecal Bacteroides, and Clostridium spp. in wet sand were measured using culture and molecular methods. RESULTS: We analyzed 144 wet sand samples and completed 4999 interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed, comparing those in the highest tertile of fecal indicator exposure with those who reported no sand contact. Among those digging in sand compared with those not digging in sand, a molecular measure of Enterococcus spp. (calibrator cell equivalents/g) in sand was positively associated with gastrointestinal (GI) illness (aOR = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.2]) and diarrhea (2.4 [1.4-4.2]). Among those buried in sand, point estimates were greater for GI illness (3.3 [1.3-7.9]) and diarrhea (4.9 [1.8-13]). Positive associations were also observed for culture-based Enterococcus (colony-forming units/g) with GI illness (aOR digging = 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) and diarrhea (2.1 [1.3-3.4]). Associations were not found among nonswimmers with sand exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a positive relationship between sand-contact activities and enteric illness as a function of concentrations of fecal microbial pollution in beach sand.
BACKGROUND:Beach sand can harbor fecal indicator organisms and pathogens, but enteric illness risk associated with sand contact remains unclear. METHODS: In 2007, visitors at 2 recreational marine beaches were asked on the day of their visit about sand contact. Ten to 12 days later, participants answered questions about health symptoms since the visit. F+ coliphage, Enterococcus, Bacteroidales, fecal Bacteroides, and Clostridium spp. in wet sand were measured using culture and molecular methods. RESULTS: We analyzed 144 wet sand samples and completed 4999 interviews. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed, comparing those in the highest tertile of fecal indicator exposure with those who reported no sand contact. Among those digging in sand compared with those not digging in sand, a molecular measure of Enterococcus spp. (calibrator cell equivalents/g) in sand was positively associated with gastrointestinal (GI) illness (aOR = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.2]) and diarrhea (2.4 [1.4-4.2]). Among those buried in sand, point estimates were greater for GI illness (3.3 [1.3-7.9]) and diarrhea (4.9 [1.8-13]). Positive associations were also observed for culture-based Enterococcus (colony-forming units/g) with GI illness (aOR digging = 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) and diarrhea (2.1 [1.3-3.4]). Associations were not found among nonswimmers with sand exposure. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a positive relationship between sand-contact activities and enteric illness as a function of concentrations of fecal microbial pollution in beach sand.
Authors: Julie Kinzelman; Sandra L McLellan; Annette D Daniels; Susan Cashin; Ajaib Singh; Stephen Gradus; Robert Bagley Journal: J Water Health Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Alan M Piggot; James S Klaus; Sara Johnson; Matthew C Phillips; Helena M Solo-Gabriele Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Christopher D Heaney; Natalie G Exum; Alfred P Dufour; Kristen P Brenner; Richard A Haugland; Eunice Chern; Kellogg J Schwab; David C Love; Marc L Serre; Rachel Noble; Timothy J Wade Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Richard Whitman; Valerie J Harwood; Thomas A Edge; Meredith Nevers; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Kannappan Vijayavel; João Brandão; Michael J Sadowsky; Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Allan Crowe; Donna Ferguson; Zhongfu Ge; Elizabeth Halliday; Julie Kinzelman; Greg Kleinheinz; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Christopher Staley; Zachery Staley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele Journal: Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 8.044
Authors: Kathryn B Mika; Karina A Chavarria; Greg Imamura; Chay Tang; Robert Torres; Jennifer A Jay Journal: Water Air Soil Pollut Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Matthew C Phillips; Zhixuan Feng; Laura J Vogel; Ad J H M Reniers; Brian K Haus; Amber A Enns; Yifan Zhang; David B Hernandez; Helena M Solo-Gabriele Journal: Mar Pollut Bull Date: 2014-01-04 Impact factor: 5.553
Authors: Melanie D Napier; Charles Poole; Jill R Stewart; David J Weber; Susan T Glassmeyer; Dana W Kolpin; Edward T Furlong; Alfred P Dufour; Timothy J Wade Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Rafael J Hernandez; Yasiel Hernandez; Nasly H Jimenez; Alan M Piggot; James S Klaus; Zhixuan Feng; Ad Reniers; Helena M Solo-Gabriele Journal: Water Res Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 11.236