Literature DB >> 24183401

Effects of full-scale beach renovation on fecal indicator levels in shoreline sand and water.

Rafael J Hernandez1, Yasiel Hernandez, Nasly H Jimenez, Alan M Piggot, James S Klaus, Zhixuan Feng, Ad Reniers, Helena M Solo-Gabriele.   

Abstract

Recolonization of enterococci, at a non-point source beach known to contain high background levels of bacteria, was studied after a full-scale beach renovation project. The renovation involved importation of new exogenous sand, in addition to infrastructure improvements. The study's objectives were to document changes in sand and water quality and to evaluate the relative contribution of different renovation activities towards these changes. These objectives were addressed: by measuring enterococci levels in the sand and fecal indicator bacteria levels (enterococci and fecal coliform) in the water, by documenting sediment characteristics (mineralogy and biofilm levels), and by estimating changes in observable enterococci loads. Analysis of enterococci levels on surface sand and within sediment depth cores were significantly higher prior to beach renovation (6.3-72 CFU/g for each sampling day) when compared to levels during and after beach renovation (0.8-12 CFU/g) (P < 0.01). During the renovation process, sand enterococci levels were frequently below detection limits (<0.1 CFU/g). For water, exceedances in the regulatory thresholds that would trigger a beach advisory decreased by 40% for enterococci and by 90% for fecal coliform. Factors that did not change significantly between pre- and post- renovation included the enterococci loads from animals (approx. 3 × 10(11) CFU per month). Factors that were observed to change between pre- and post- renovation activities included: the composition of the beach sand (64% versus 98% quartz, and a significant decrease in biofilm levels) and loads from direct stormwater inputs (reduction of 3 × 10(11) CFU per month). Overall, this study supports that beach renovation activities contributed to improved sand and water quality resulting in a 50% decrease of observable enterococci loads due to upgrades to the stormwater infrastructure. Of interest was that the change in the sand mineralogy also coincided with changes in biofilm levels. More work is needed to evaluate the relationships between beach sand mineralogy, biofilm characteristics, and the retention of fecal indicator bacteria in sand.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beach renovation; Beach sand; Enterococci; Fecal coliform; Fecal indicator bacteria; Recreational water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183401      PMCID: PMC3915934          DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  27 in total

1.  Monitoring marine recreational water quality using multiple microbial indicators in an urban tropical environment.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Shibata; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Lora E Fleming; Samir Elmir
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Indigenous soil bacteria and low moisture may limit but allow faecal bacteria to multiply and become a minor population in tropical soils.

Authors:  M Byappanahalli; R Fujioka
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Relationship between enterococcal levels and sediment biofilms at recreational beaches in South Florida.

Authors:  Alan M Piggot; James S Klaus; Sara Johnson; Matthew C Phillips; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Quantitative evaluation of bacteria released by bathers in a marine water.

Authors:  Samir M Elmir; Mary E Wright; Amir Abdelzaher; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Lora E Fleming; Gary Miller; Michael Rybolowik; Meng-Ta Peter Shih; Segaran P Pillai; Jennifer A Cooper; Elesi A Quaye
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Growth of enterococci in unaltered, unseeded beach sands subjected to tidal wetting.

Authors:  Kevan M Yamahara; Sarah P Walters; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Sources of Escherichia coli in a coastal subtropical environment.

Authors:  H M Solo-Gabriele; M A Wolfert; T R Desmarais; C J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment.

Authors:  Timothy R Desmarais; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Carol J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The potential for beach sand to serve as a reservoir for Escherichia coli and the physical influences on cell die-off.

Authors:  L J Beversdorf; S M Bornstein-Forst; S L McLellan
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Beach sands along the California coast are diffuse sources of fecal bacteria to coastal waters.

Authors:  Kevan M Yamahara; Blythe A Layton; Alyson E Santoro; Alexandria B Boehm
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Janice Burke; Anne Spain
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  7 in total

1.  Water quality, weather and environmental factors associated with fecal indicator organism density in beach sand at two recreational marine beaches.

Authors:  Christopher D Heaney; Natalie G Exum; Alfred P Dufour; Kristen P Brenner; Richard A Haugland; Eunice Chern; Kellogg J Schwab; David C Love; Marc L Serre; Rachel Noble; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  A predictive model for microbial counts on beaches where intertidal sand is the primary source.

Authors:  Zhixuan Feng; Ad Reniers; Brian K Haus; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; John D Wang; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Enterococci from Wild Magellanic Penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) as an Indicator of Marine Ecosystem Health and Human Impact.

Authors:  Janira Prichula; Daria Van Tyne; Julia Schwartzman; Fernando Hayashi Sant'Anna; Rebeca Inhoque Pereira; Gabriela Rosa da Cunha; Maurício Tavares; François Lebreton; Jeverson Frazzon; Pedro Alves d'Azevedo; Adriana Seixas; Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of beach management policies on recreational water quality.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kelly; Zhixuan Feng; Maribeth L Gidley; Christopher D Sinigalliano; Naresh Kumar; Allison G Donahue; Adrianus J H M Reniers; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Wave energy level and geographic setting correlate with Florida beach water quality.

Authors:  Zhixuan Feng; Ad Reniers; Brian K Haus; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Elizabeth A Kelly
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  U.S. Recreational Water Quality Criteria: A Vision for the Future.

Authors:  Roger S Fujioka; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Marek Kirs
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Regime shift in sandy beach microbial communities following Deepwater Horizon oil spill remediation efforts.

Authors:  Annette Summers Engel; Axita A Gupta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.