Literature DB >> 22156833

Molecular classification of estrogen receptor-positive/luminal breast cancers.

Felipe C Geyer1, Daniel N Rodrigues, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S Reis-Filho.   

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is the most prevalent subtype of invasive breast cancers. Patients with ER-positive breast cancers have variable clinical outcomes and responses to endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. With the advent of microarray-based gene expression profiling, unsupervised analysis methods have resulted in a classification of ER-positive disease into subtypes with different outcomes (ie, luminal A and luminal B); subsequent studies have demonstrated that these subtypes have different patterns of genetic aberrations and outcome. Studies based on supervised methods of microarray analysis have led to the development of prognostic gene signatures that identify a subgroup of ER-positive breast cancer patients with excellent outcome, who could forego chemotherapy. Despite the excitement with these approaches, several lines of evidence have demonstrated that the subclassification of ER-positive cancers and the prognostic value of gene signatures is largely driven by the expression levels of proliferation-related genes and that proliferation markers, such as Ki67, may provide equivalent prognostic information to that provided by gene signatures. In this review, we discuss the contribution of gene expression profiling to the classification of ER-positive breast cancer, the role of prognostic and predictive signatures, and the potential stratification of ER-positive disease according to their dependency on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22156833     DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31823fafa0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol        ISSN: 1072-4109            Impact factor:   3.875


  25 in total

1.  MCM2: An alternative to Ki-67 for measuring breast cancer cell proliferation.

Authors:  Einas M Yousef; Daniela Furrer; David L Laperriere; Muhammad R Tahir; Sylvie Mader; Caroline Diorio; Louis A Gaboury
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Breast cancer subtype intertumor heterogeneity: MRI-based features predict results of a genomic assay.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ozlem Yersal; Sabri Barutca
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  Breast cancer prognosis predicted by nuclear receptor-coregulator networks.

Authors:  Tram B Doan; Natalie A Eriksson; Dinny Graham; John W Funder; Evan R Simpson; Elizabeth S Kuczek; Colin Clyne; Peter J Leedman; Wayne D Tilley; Peter J Fuller; George E O Muscat; Christine L Clarke
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Luminal breast cancer classification according to proliferative indices: clinicopathological characteristics and short-term survival analysis.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Gang Nie; Zhimin Wei; Zhidong Lv; Xiaoyi Liu; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  STAT signaling in different breast cancer sub-types.

Authors:  Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  Stromal genes add prognostic information to proliferation and histoclinical markers: a basis for the next generation of breast cancer gene signatures.

Authors:  Dwain Mefford; Joel Mefford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Ki67 targeted strategies for cancer therapy.

Authors:  C Yang; J Zhang; M Ding; K Xu; L Li; L Mao; J Zheng
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.340

9.  The maximum standardized uptake value of 18 F-FDG PET scan to determine prognosis of hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Zhen Jia; Joseph Ragaz; Ying-Jian Zhang; Min Zhou; Yong-Ping Zhang; Gang Li; Bi-Yun Wang; Zhong-Hua Wang; Xi-Chun Hu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Oxidative stress specifically downregulates survivin to promote breast tumour formation.

Authors:  S Pervin; L Tran; R Urman; M Braga; M Parveen; S A Li; G Chaudhuri; R Singh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.