Literature DB >> 24935624

Luminal breast cancer classification according to proliferative indices: clinicopathological characteristics and short-term survival analysis.

Yan Sun1, Gang Nie, Zhimin Wei, Zhidong Lv, Xiaoyi Liu, Haibo Wang.   

Abstract

The classification of luminal breast cancer has been a popular topic regarding its heterogeneity with distinct biological features and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the power of proliferative indices (Ki67 and histological grade) to determine various clinicopathological characteristics and survival in luminal disease. A total of 541 patients with stage I-III luminal breast cancer were enrolled. Subtypes were determined using proliferative indices and were compared with clinicopathological variables and short-term survival. The significance of various treatments was evaluated in a subgroup of pN0 (lymph node negative) patients. Histological grade, independent of other variables, was a better predictor in the ER/PR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2) subgroup (p = 0.011) and the pN0 subgroup (p = 0.044) compared with Ki67, which only showed significance in the ER/PR+, Her-2 subgroup (p = 0.008). Neither grade nor Ki67 was associated with outcomes in the luminal Her-2 class. In pN0 patients, various treatments did not show significance in short-term survival. Histological grade outperformed Ki67 as a determinant for the stratification of luminal class regarding short-term survival. Chemotherapy most likely did not provide additional benefit to pN0 patients with luminal breast cancer compared with endocrine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935624     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0055-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  37 in total

1.  The utility of mitotic index, oestrogen receptor and Ki-67 measurements in the creation of novel prognostic indices for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  P C Clahsen; C J van de Velde; C Duval; C Pallud; A M Mandard; A Delobelle-Deroide; L van den Broek; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential.

Authors:  Rinat Yerushalmi; Ryan Woods; Peter M Ravdin; Malcolm M Hayes; Karen A Gelmon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Molecular evolution of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter T Simpson; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Theodora Gale; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemical markers: clinicopathologic features and short-term survival analysis in a population-based study from the South of Switzerland.

Authors:  A Spitale; P Mazzola; D Soldini; L Mazzucchelli; A Bordoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Prevalence, morphologic features and proliferation indices of breast carcinoma molecular classes using immunohistochemical surrogate markers.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Joan Striebel; Sushil Beriwal; John C Flickinger; Agnieszka Onisko; Gretchen Ahrendt; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-02-09

6.  Prognostic value of proliferation assay in the luminal, HER2-positive, and triple-negative biologic classes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Andrew R Green; Ahmed A Benhasouna; Fabricio F Barros; Keith Neal; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ian O Ellis; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries?

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Zhen-Zhou Shen; Tse-Jia Liu; Gaurav Agarwal; Tomoo Tajima; Nam-Sun Paik; Kerstin Sandelin; Anna Derossis; Hiram Cody; William D Foulkes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  E H Lips; L Mulder; J J de Ronde; I A M Mandjes; B B Koolen; L F A Wessels; S Rodenhuis; J Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J N Ingle; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients.

Authors:  E de Azambuja; F Cardoso; G de Castro; M Colozza; M S Mano; V Durbecq; C Sotiriou; D Larsimont; M J Piccart-Gebhart; M Paesmans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic relevance of biological subtype overrides that of TNM staging in breast cancer: discordance between stage and biology.

Authors:  Hyun Ae Jung; Yeon Hee Park; Moonjin Kim; Sungmin Kim; Won Jin Chang; Moon Ki Choi; Jung Yong Hong; Seok Won Kim; Won Ho Kil; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-19

2.  Aberrant expression of Arpin in human breast cancer and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Xiangping Liu; Bin Zhao; Haibo Wang; Yu Wang; Mengdi Niu; Ming Sun; Yang Zhao; Ruyong Yao; Zhiqiang Qu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.310

3.  Extensive Transcriptomic and Genomic Analysis Provides New Insights about Luminal Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Inna Tishchenko; Heloisa Helena Milioli; Carlos Riveros; Pablo Moscato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.