Literature DB >> 22156753

Dialysis modality and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

Miklos Z Molnar1, Rajnish Mehrotra, Uyen Duong, Suphamai Bunnapradist, Lilia R Lukowsky, Mahesh Krishnan, Csaba P Kovesdy, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The influence of pretransplant dialysis modality on post-transplant outcomes is not clear. This study examined associations of pretransplant dialysis modality with post-transplant outcomes in a large national cohort of kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Linking the 5-year patient data of a large dialysis organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 12,416 hemodialysis and 2092 peritoneal dialysis patients who underwent first kidney transplantation were identified. Mortality or graft failure and delayed graft function risks were estimated by Cox regression (hazard ratio) and logistic regression (odds ratio), respectively.
RESULTS: Recipients treated with peritoneal dialysis pretransplantation had lower (21.9/1000 patient-years [95% confidence interval: 18.1-26.5]) crude all-cause mortality rate than those recipients treated with hemodialysis (32.8/1000 patient-years [30.8-35.0]). Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 43% lower adjusted all-cause and 66% lower cardiovascular death. Furthermore, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 17% and 36% lower unadjusted death-censored graft failure and delayed graft function risk, respectively. However, after additional adjustment for relevant covariates, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis modality was not a significant predictor of death-censored graft failure delayed graft function, respectively. Similar trends were noted on analyses using a propensity score matched cohort of 2092 pairs of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with hemodialysis, patients treated with peritoneal dialysis before transplantation had lower mortality but similar graft loss or delayed graft function. Confounding by residual selection bias cannot be ruled out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22156753      PMCID: PMC3280027          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07110711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  32 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis favorably influences early graft function after renal transplantation compared to hemodialysis.

Authors:  W Van Biesen; R Vanholder; A Van Loo; M Van Der Vennet; N Lameire
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparative study of chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis patients after kidney transplantation: clinical and financial assessment.

Authors:  R Binaut; M Hazzan; F R Pruvot; M Dracon; G Lelièvre; C Noël
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation: a five year experience.

Authors:  P K Donnelly; T W Lennard; G Proud; R M Taylor; R Henderson; K Fletcher; W Elliott; M K Ward; R Wilkinson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-10-12

5.  Renal transplantation in patients treated with haemodialysis and short term and long term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  J B Evangelista; D Bennett-Jones; J S Cameron; C Ogg; D G Williams; D H Taube; G Neild; C Rudge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-10-12

6.  Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant.

Authors:  F G Cosio; A Alamir; S Yim; T E Pesavento; M E Falkenhain; M L Henry; E A Elkhammas; E A Davies; G L Bumgardner; R M Ferguson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  A comparison of transplant outcomes in peritoneal and hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske; David T Gilbertson; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  The influence of mode of dialysis pretransplantation on long-term renal allograft outcome.

Authors:  T V Cacciarelli; N B Sumrani; A DiBenedetto; J H Hong; B G Sommer
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.606

9.  Comparison between two dialytic populations undergoing renal transplantation.

Authors:  G Triolo; G P Segoloni; M Salomone; G B Piccoli; M Messina; C Massara; D B Bertinet; A Vercellone
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1990

10.  Renal transplantation in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  M P Pérez Fontán; A Rodríguez-Carmona; T García Falcón; J Moncalián; J Oliver; F Valdés
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  19 in total

1.  Mortality associated with dose response of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Uyen Duong; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Miklos Z Molnar; Joshua J Zaritsky; Isaac Teitelbaum; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.754

2.  Predictive Score for Posttransplantation Outcomes.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Danh V Nguyen; Yanjun Chen; Vanessa Ravel; Elani Streja; Mahesh Krishnan; Csaba P Kovesdy; Rajnish Mehrotra; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis improves long-term survival of kidney transplant patients: a single-center observational study.

Authors:  María O López-Oliva; Begoña Rivas; Elia Pérez-Fernández; Marta Ossorio; Silvia Ros; Carlos Chica; Ana Aguilar; María-Auxiliadora Bajo; Fernando Escuin; Luis Hidalgo; Rafael Selgas; Carlos Jiménez
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Effect of center practices on the choice of the first dialysis modality for children and young adults.

Authors:  Julien Hogan; Bruno Ranchin; Marc Fila; Jérome Harambat; Saoussen Krid; Isabelle Vrillon; Gwenaelle Roussey; Michel Fischbach; Cécile Couchoud
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Changes in Treatment of Patients with Incident ESKD during the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  James B Wetmore; Kirsten L Johansen; Jiannong Liu; Yi Peng; David T Gilbertson; Eric D Weinhandl
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 6.  The Role of Peritoneal Dialysis in Different Phases of Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Ali I Gardezi; Fahad Aziz; Sandesh Parajuli
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Association of pre-kidney transplant markers of mineral and bone disorder with post-transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Csaba P Kovesdy; Istvan Mucsi; Isidro B Salusky; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Association of Cold Ischemia Time With Acute Renal Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Merve Postalcioglu; Arnaud D Kaze; Benjamin C Byun; Andrew Siedlecki; Stefan G Tullius; Edgar L Milford; Julie M Paik; Reza Abdi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Association of pre-transplant blood pressure with post-transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Clarence E Foster; John J Sim; Adam Remport; Mahesh Krishnan; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Optimizing Decellularization Strategies for the Efficient Production of Whole Rat Kidney Scaffolds.

Authors:  Panagiotis Mallis; Charalampos Oikonomidis; Zetta Dimou; Catherine Stavropoulos-Giokas; Efstathios Michalopoulos; Michalis Katsimpoulas
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.