Literature DB >> 2215560

Effect of long-term monitoring of glycosylated hemoglobin levels in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

M L Larsen1, M Hørder, E F Mogensen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of routine measurements of glycosylated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c) in the care of patients with diabetes mellitus is uncertain. We undertook this study to determine whether knowledge of hemoglobin A1c values would result in improved metabolic control in a group of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).
METHODS: We randomly assigned 240 patients with IDDM to one of two groups that were comparable in age, sex, duration of diabetes, and initial hemoglobin A1c levels. The patients were followed for a year, and the hemoglobin A1c concentration was measured at three-month intervals. The hemoglobin A1c values were used in assessing glycemic control and modifying therapy in one of the two groups. In the other, care givers were not aware of the hemoglobin A1c levels and relied on blood or urine glucose measurements to monitor treatment.
RESULTS: Among the 222 patients still being followed after one year, the mean hemoglobin A1c value decreased significantly--from 10.1 to 9.5 percent (P less than 0.005)--in the group whose hemoglobin A1c level was monitored (n = 115), whereas the initial and one-year values in the control group (n = 107) were 10.0 and 10.1 percent, respectively. The proportion of patients with poor control, defined as those having a hemoglobin A1c value above 10.0 percent, decreased from 46 to 30 percent (P less than 0.01) in the group whose hemoglobin A1c level was monitored but did not change significantly (45 to 50 percent) in the control group. The patients in the group whose hemoglobin A1c level was monitored were seen and their insulin regimens changed more often, but they were hospitalized for acute care of their diabetes less often than those in the control group. A similar decrease in hemoglobin A1c values occurred in the control group in the following year, when their care givers knew their hemoglobin A1c values.
CONCLUSIONS: Regular measurements of hemoglobin A1c lead to changes in diabetes treatment and improvement of metabolic control, indicated by a lowering of hemoglobin A1c values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2215560     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199010113231503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  36 in total

1.  Are ancient proteins responsible for the age-related decline in health and fitness?

Authors:  Roger John Willis Truscott
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.663

2.  Improving outcomes with POCT for HbA1c and blood ketone testing.

Authors:  Lori Laffel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

3.  Modified HPLC-ESI-MS Method for Glycated Hemoglobin Quantification Based on the IFCC Reference Measurement Procedure and Its Application for Quantitative Analyses in Clinical Laboratories of China.

Authors:  Zhixin Song; Baoyuan Xie; Huaian Ma; Rui Zhang; Pengfei Li; Lihong Liu; Yuhong Yue; Jianping Zhang; Qing Tong; Qingtao Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  A randomised, controlled trial of self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving conventional insulin treatment.

Authors:  Michael A Nauck; Burkhard Haastert; Christoph Trautner; Ulrich A Müller; Matthias A Nauck; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Diabetes, glycemic control and risk of medical glaucoma treatment: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Lotte G Welinder; Anders H Riis; Lars L Knudsen; Reimar W Thomsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Diabetes care in general practice: an approach to audit of process and outcome.

Authors:  F K Tunbridge; J P Millar; P J Schofield; J A Spencer; G Young; P D Home
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Management of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Isolated systolic hypertension and the risk of vascular disease.

Authors:  Tim Nawrot; Elly Den Hond; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.369

10.  Thiobarbiturate and fructosamine assays: significance and interest of the borohydride blank.

Authors:  M Vanhaeverbeek; D Brohee; A Lefevre; P Piro; B Kennes; P Neve
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.