Literature DB >> 22151655

Complications of intrathecal drug delivery systems.

S Kamran1, B D Wright.   

Abstract

Objectives. To report complications associated with implant of the intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS). Patients and Methods. A retrospective review of the implant database was undertaken to determine various complications associated with the IDDS. A total of 122 patients were reviewed, 97 included in the final analysis, 25 excluded due to incomplete data. The complications of excluded patients were reviewed separately. The complications were divided in to categories pharmacologic, equipment, procedural, programming errors and psychological. The drugs used were morphine, dilaudid, fentanyl, sufentanil, baclofen, and marcaine. Results. There were 60 men and 37 women. A total of 43 patients reported various complications. Most common were transient pharmacologic side effects (n= 33), procedural (n= 5), equipment (n= 16), programming (n= 2), and psychological (n= 3). The most serious procedural complication was Staphylococcus aureus meningitis (n= 1). Catheter disconnection and leakage was noted in (n= 6) patients. Two programming errors were related to increase in drug concentration with failure to reduce the dose. Seven pumps were explanted, including three due to distorted body image. Conclusion. IDDS are effective and safe devices for pain management. The complications associated with implants are mostly pharmacological and transient.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 22151655     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00111.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  8 in total

Review 1.  Implantable intrathecal pumps for chronic pain: highlights and updates.

Authors:  Karen H Knight; Frances M Brand; Ali S Mchaourab; Giorgio Veneziano
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 2.  Intrathecal therapy for chronic pain: current trends and future needs.

Authors:  Salim M Hayek; Michael C Hanes
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

3.  Eliciting health state utilities from the general public for severe chronic pain.

Authors:  S Eldabe; A Lloyd; L Verdian; M Meguro; G Maclaine; S Dewilde
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-08-13

4.  Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  W Coenen; C Gutiérrez-Montes; S Sincomb; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; V Haughton; C Martínez-Bazán; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems Survey: Trends in Utilization in Pain Practice.

Authors:  Alaa Abd-Sayed; Kenneth Fiala; Jacqueline Weisbein; Pooja Chopra; Christopher Lam; Hemant Kalia; Navdeep Jassal; Amitabh Gulati; Dawood Sayed; Timothy Deer
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Intrathecal analgesia and palliative care: a case study.

Authors:  Naveen S Salins; Gregory B Crawford
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01

7.  Adverse Events and Complications Associated With Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems: Insights From the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Authors:  Vasudha Goel; Yan Yang; Siddak Kanwar; Ratan K Banik; Amol M Patwardhan; Mohab Ibrahim; Eellan Sivanesan; Hariharan Shankar
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Treatment of Refractory Postdural Puncture Headache after Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implantation with Epidural Blood Patch Procedures: A 20-Year Experience.

Authors:  Markus A Bendel; Susan M Moeschler; Wenchun Qu; Eugerie Hanley; Stephanie A Neuman; Jason S Eldrige; Bryan C Hoelzer
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.