Literature DB >> 19680700

Eliciting health state utilities from the general public for severe chronic pain.

S Eldabe1, A Lloyd, L Verdian, M Meguro, G Maclaine, S Dewilde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is an absence of data on public preferences for health states (HSs) associated with severe chronic pain. The aim of this study was to develop accurate HS descriptions for severe chronic pain requiring intrathecal (IT) therapy and to derive utility weights that describe the health-related quality of life (HRQL) impact of chronic pain associated with malignant (MP) and non-malignant (NMP) aetiologies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHOD: Eight visual analogue scale pain index (VAS-PI) HSs were defined using ranges 0-40, 41-60, 61-80 and 81-100 applied to both MP and NMP. Additionally, eight HSs representing common adverse events associated with IT therapy were identified. The content and description of the HSs were ascertained by interviews with five United Kingdom clinical experts. In total, 16 HSs were compiled. These HS descriptions and HS questionnaires were administered to 102 members of the public, utilising a time trade off (TTO) approach to estimate utilities for the HSs.
RESULTS: Participants generally were well matched to the general public in England and Wales, with some differences in mean age, race and education. A substantial decline in utility was observed with more severe VAS-PI values. The mean TTO utility values also decreased from mild pain to severe pain. Participants were able to differentiate between the side effects.
CONCLUSION: The study shows a clear decrement in utility moving from different severity levels of severe chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19680700     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-009-0178-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  32 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Intrathecal ketamine reduces morphine requirements in patients with terminal cancer pain.

Authors:  C Y Yang; C S Wong; J Y Chang; S T Ho
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Ziconotide infusion for severe chronic pain: case series of patients with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Daniel P Wermeling; Joseph R Berger
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.705

4.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carlsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid treatment in chronic pain of nonmalignant etiology.

Authors:  M Winkelmüller; W Winkelmüller
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Continuous infusion of opioid and bupivacaine by externalized intrathecal catheters in long-term treatment of "refractory" nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  P Nitescu; P Dahm; L Appelgren; I Curelaru
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Long-term intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine in patients with refractory cancer pain. Results from a morphine:bupivacaine dose regimen of 0.5:4.75 mg/ml.

Authors:  M Sjöberg; P Nitescu; L Appelgren; I Curelaru
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Intrathecal infusion systems for treatment of chronic low back and leg pain of noncancer origin.

Authors:  U Tutak; D M Doleys
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Complications of intrathecal drug delivery systems.

Authors:  S Kamran; B D Wright
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Deriving health state utilities for the numerical pain rating scale.

Authors:  Simon Dixon; Chris D Poole; Isaac Odeyemi; Peny Retsa; Colette Chambers; Craig J Currie
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Health utilities for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Anna Lene Seidler; Constanze Rethberg; Jochen Schmitt; Albert Nienhaus; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Benefits in pain perception, ability function and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome undergoing spinal cord stimulation in a clinical practice setting.

Authors:  Luciana Scalone; Furio Zucco; Angelo Lavano; Amedeo Costantini; Marisa De Rose; Paolo Poli; Gianpaolo Fortini; Laura Demartini; Enrico De Simone; Valentino Menardo; Mario Meglio; Paolo Cozzolino; Paolo A Cortesi; Lorenzo G Mantovani
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of five procedures for great saphenous vein reflux in a Norwegian healthcare setting or societal setting.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Carl-Henrik Schelp; Inge Glambek; Ivar S Kristiansen
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-09-24

5.  The time horizon matters: results of an exploratory study varying the timeframe in time trade-off and standard gamble utility elicitation.

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Kristina S Boye; David H Feeny; Lee Bowman; Joseph A Johnston; Katie D Stewart; Kelly McDaniel; Jessica Jordan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-11-26

6.  Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu capsule in the treatment of qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome: a study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot and feasibility trial.

Authors:  Haoqiang He; Guang Chen; Jialiang Gao; Yu Liu; Chenhao Zhang; Chao Liu; Hongzheng Li; Qingyong He; Jun Li; Jie Wang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.