OBJECTIVE: This study examines adolescent-specific practical problems associated with current practice parameters for diagnosing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to inform recommendations for the diagnosis of ADHD in adolescents. Specifically, issues surrounding the use of self- versus informant ratings, diagnostic threshold, and retrospective reporting of childhood symptoms were addressed. METHOD: Using data from the Pittsburgh ADHD Longitudinal Study (PALS), parent, teacher, and self-reports of symptoms and impairment were examined for 164 adolescents with a childhood diagnosis of ADHD (age M = 14.74 years) and 119 demographically similar non-ADHD controls (total N = 283). RESULTS: Results indicated that 70% of the well-diagnosed childhood ADHD group continued to meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) diagnostic criteria for ADHD in adolescence; however, an additional 17% possessed clinically significant impairment in adolescence but did not qualify for a current ADHD diagnosis. The optimal source of information was combined reports from the parent and a core academic teacher. Adolescents with ADHD met criteria for very few symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity, suggesting a need to revisit the diagnostic threshold for these items. Additionally, emphasis on impairment, rather than symptom threshold, improved identification of adolescents with a gold-standard childhood diagnosis of ADHD and persistent ADHD symptoms. Parent retrospective reports of baseline functioning, but not adolescent self-reports, were significantly correlated with reports collected at baseline in childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are offered for diagnosing ADHD in adolescence based on these findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: This study examines adolescent-specific practical problems associated with current practice parameters for diagnosing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to inform recommendations for the diagnosis of ADHD in adolescents. Specifically, issues surrounding the use of self- versus informant ratings, diagnostic threshold, and retrospective reporting of childhood symptoms were addressed. METHOD: Using data from the Pittsburgh ADHD Longitudinal Study (PALS), parent, teacher, and self-reports of symptoms and impairment were examined for 164 adolescents with a childhood diagnosis of ADHD (age M = 14.74 years) and 119 demographically similar non-ADHD controls (total N = 283). RESULTS: Results indicated that 70% of the well-diagnosed childhood ADHD group continued to meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) diagnostic criteria for ADHD in adolescence; however, an additional 17% possessed clinically significant impairment in adolescence but did not qualify for a current ADHD diagnosis. The optimal source of information was combined reports from the parent and a core academic teacher. Adolescents with ADHD met criteria for very few symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity, suggesting a need to revisit the diagnostic threshold for these items. Additionally, emphasis on impairment, rather than symptom threshold, improved identification of adolescents with a gold-standard childhood diagnosis of ADHD and persistent ADHD symptoms. Parent retrospective reports of baseline functioning, but not adolescent self-reports, were significantly correlated with reports collected at baseline in childhood. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations are offered for diagnosing ADHD in adolescence based on these findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Mark L Wolraich; Charles J Wibbelsman; Thomas E Brown; Steven W Evans; Edward M Gotlieb; John R Knight; E Clarke Ross; Howard H Shubiner; Esther H Wender; Timothy Wilens Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Margaret H Sibley; William E Pelham; Brooke S G Molina; Elizabeth M Gnagy; James G Waxmonsky; Daniel A Waschbusch; Karen J Derefinko; Brian T Wymbs; Allison C Garefino; Dara E Babinski; Aparajita B Kuriyan Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-07-09
Authors: Andrea L Howard; Brooke S G Molina; James M Swanson; Stephen P Hinshaw; Katherine A Belendiuk; Seth C Harty; L Eugene Arnold; Howard B Abikoff; Lily Hechtman; Annamarie Stehli; Laurence L Greenhill; Jeffrey H Newcorn; Timothy Wigal Journal: Addiction Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Stephen P Becker; Jeffery N Epstein; Leanne Tamm; Alina A Tilford; Clair M Tischner; Paul A Isaacson; John O Simon; Dean W Beebe Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Joseph S Raiker; Andrew J Freeman; Guillermo Perez-Algorta; Thomas W Frazier; Robert L Findling; Eric A Youngstrom Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Brooke S G Molina; William E Pelham; JeeWon Cheong; Michael P Marshal; Elizabeth M Gnagy; Patrick J Curran Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-07-30