Literature DB >> 22147887

Use and effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pumps among patients undergoing high risk percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Jeptha P Curtis1, Saif S Rathore, Yongfei Wang, Jersey Chen, Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) frequently are used to provide hemodynamic support during high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but clinical evidence to support their use is mixed. We examined hospital variation in IABP use among high risk PCI patients, and determined the association of IABP use on mortality in this population. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed data submitted to the CathPCI Registry between January 2005 and December 2007. High risk PCI was defined as having at least 1 of the following features: unprotected left main artery as the target vessel, cardiogenic shock, severely depressed left ventricular function, or ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles by their proportional use of IABP. We examined differences in in-hospital mortality across hospital quartiles using a hierarchical logistic regression model to adjust for differences in patient and hospital characteristics across hospital quartiles of IABP use. IABPs were used in 18,990 (10.5%) of 181,599 high risk PCIs. Proportional use of IABP varied significantly across hospital quartiles: Q1, 0.0 to 6.5%; Q2, 6.6 to 9.2%; Q3, 9.3 to 14.1%; Q4, 14.2 to 40.0%. In multivariable analysis, after adjustment for differences in patient and hospital characteristics, in-hospital mortality was comparable across quartiles of hospital IABP usage (Q1, Ref; Q2, odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.24; Q3, OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15; Q4, OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.18).
CONCLUSIONS: IABP use varied significantly across hospitals for high risk PCI. However, this variation in IABP use was not associated with differences in in-hospital mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22147887      PMCID: PMC3801197          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.960385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  24 in total

1.  Variation in hospital rates of intraaortic balloon pump use in coronary artery bypass operations.

Authors:  W A Ghali; A S Ash; R E Hall; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  High-risk coronary angioplasty with elective intra-aortic balloon pump support.

Authors:  I Kreidieh; D W Davies; R Lim; A W Nathan; D S Dymond; S O Banim
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Role of intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation in high risk coronary rotational atherectomy.

Authors:  B O'Murchu; R D Foreman; R E Shaw; D L Brown; K L Peterson; M Buchbinder
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  "High-risk" percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with preventive intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Authors:  V Voudris; J Marco; M C Morice; J Fajadet; T Royer
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1990-03

5.  A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  G W Stone; D Marsalese; B R Brodie; J J Griffin; B Donohue; C Costantini; C Balestrini; T Wharton; P Esente; M Spain; J Moses; M Nobuyoshi; M Ayres; D Jones; D Mason; L Grines; W W O'Neill; C L Grines
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  Carlo Briguori; Cristiano Sarais; Paolo Pagnotta; Flavio Airoldi; Francesco Liistro; Fabio Sgura; Vassilis Spanos; Mauro Carlino; Matteo Montorfano; Carlo Di Mario; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B R Brodie; T D Stuckey; C Hansen; D Muncy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Relation between hospital intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation volume and mortality in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Edmond W Chen; John G Canto; Lori S Parsons; Eric D Peterson; Katherine A Littrell; Nathan R Every; C Michael Gibson; Judith S Hochman; E Magnus Ohman; Morris Cheeks; Hal V Barron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon pumping after primary coronary angioplasty in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A W van 't Hof; A L Liem; M J de Boer; J C Hoorntje; H Suryapranata; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Use of aortic counterpulsation to improve sustained coronary artery patency during acute myocardial infarction. Results of a randomized trial. The Randomized IABP Study Group.

Authors:  E M Ohman; B S George; C J White; M J Kern; P A Gurbel; R J Freedman; C Lundergan; J R Hartmann; J D Talley; M J Frey
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.

Authors:  Manal Alasnag; Alexander G Truesdell; Holli Williams; Sara C Martinez; Syeda Kashfi Qadri; John P Skendelas; William A Jakobleff; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Real-World Evidence: Promise and Peril For Medical Product Evaluation.

Authors:  Sanket S Dhruva; Joseph S Ross; Nihar R Desai
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Wahaj Aman; Omar Jeroudi; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

4.  Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jordan B Strom; Yuansong Zhao; Changyu Shen; Mabel Chung; Duane S Pinto; Jeffrey J Popma; David J Cohen; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.546

5.  A value-based analysis of hemodynamic support strategies for high-risk heart failure patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  David Gregory; Dennis J Scotti; Gregory de Lissovoy; Igor Palacios; Simon Dixon; Brijeshwar Maini; William O'Neill
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-03

6.  High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of public reporting: clinical and ethical considerations in the care of an elderly patient with critical left main disease and shock.

Authors:  Beau M Hawkins; Lisa M Fitzgerald-McKeon; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Temporal trends in the use of intraaortic balloon pump associated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States, 1998-2008.

Authors:  Hiren Patel; Anupama Shivaraju; Gregg C Fonarow; Hui Xie; Weihua Gao; Adhir R Shroff; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Mathias Hochadel; Karl-Eugen Hauptmann; Klaus Wiegand; Burghard Schuhmacher; Johannes Brachmann; Anselm Gitt; Ralf Zahn
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Temporal Trends of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Treated with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping: A Nationwide Population Study in Taiwan, 1998-2008.

Authors:  Chung-Han Ho; Zhih-Cherng Chen; Chin-Chen Chu; Jhi-Joung Wang; Chun-Yen Chiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The role of acute circulatory support in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Michele Esposito; Yousef Bader; Robert Pedicini; Catalina Breton; Andrew Mullin; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.