Literature DB >> 12679768

Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Carlo Briguori1, Cristiano Sarais, Paolo Pagnotta, Flavio Airoldi, Francesco Liistro, Fabio Sgura, Vassilis Spanos, Mauro Carlino, Matteo Montorfano, Carlo Di Mario, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elective intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support may reduce acute complications occurring during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with severe depression of the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF < or = 30%).
METHODS: Since February 1998, 133 consecutive patients with EF < or =30% underwent elective PCI in our institution; 61 had elective preprocedural IABP support (group A) and 72 patients had conventional PCI (group B). Jeopardy score was calculated in each patient from the coronary angiograms to quantify the myocardium at risk.
RESULTS: EF was similar in the 2 groups. Jeopardy score was higher in group A (8.0 +/- 2.8 vs 6.7 +/- 2.4, P =.008). The other principal clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Severe hypotension and/or shock occurred in 11 patients, all in group B (P =.001). All required urgent IABP support, and 3 eventually died. Intraprocedural major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (eg, myocardial infarction, severe hypotension and/or shock, urgent bypass surgery, stroke, and death) were higher in group B (17% vs 0%, P =.001). By stepwise logistic regression analysis, elective IABP support (odds ration [OR] 0.11 [95% CI 0.21-0.60], P =.011), jeopardy score (OR 5.37 [95% CI 1.10-8.70], P =.040), and female sex (OR 2.72 [95% CI 1.85-3.10], P =.015), were the correlates of intraprocedural events.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the potential usefulness of elective versus provisional IABP to prevent intraprocedural major adverse cardiac and cerebral events in high-risk PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679768     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2003.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  11 in total

1.  Intraaortic balloon pump: incidence and predictors of complications in the Florence registry.

Authors:  Serafina Valente; Chiara Lazzeri; Elena Crudeli; Marco Chiostri; Cristina Giglioli; Pasquale Bernardo; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Use and effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pumps among patients undergoing high risk percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Jeptha P Curtis; Saif S Rathore; Yongfei Wang; Jersey Chen; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 3.  Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.

Authors:  Manal Alasnag; Alexander G Truesdell; Holli Williams; Sara C Martinez; Syeda Kashfi Qadri; John P Skendelas; William A Jakobleff; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Appraising the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes of percutaneous drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main disease: insights from a multicenter registry of 975 patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Imad Sheiban; Claudio Moretti; Tullio Palmerini; Antonio Marzocchi; Davide Capodanno; Corrado Tamburino; Massimo Margheri; Giuseppe Vecchi; Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Andrea Santarelli; Antonio L Bartorelli; Carlo Briguori; Luigi Vignali; Francesco di Pede; Angelo Ramondo; Massimo Medda; Marco de Carlo; Giovanni Falsini; Alberto Benassi; Cataldo Palmieri; Vincenzo Filippone; Diego Sangiorgi; Fabio Barlocco; Stefano de Servi
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jon Spiro; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  The Role of Percutaneous Haemodynamic Support in High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Dagmar M Ouweneel; Bimmer E Claessen; Krischan D Sjauw; José Ps Henriques
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-03

7.  Left Ventricular Pressure Ratio Predicts In-Hospital Outcomes in Hospitalized Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Sameh W Almousa; Mark N Belkin; Tess Allan; Allison Stephens; Joseph Kern; Miryea Cisneros; Janet Friant; Cynthia Arevalo; Sandeep Nathan; Atman P Shah; Jonathan Paul; Rohan Kalathiya; Jonathan Grinstein; John E A Blair
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.022

8.  Transradial unprotected left main coronary stenting supported by percutaneous Impella Recover LP 2.5 assist device.

Authors:  H H Minden; H Lehmann; J Meyhöfer; C Butter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 6.138

9.  First successful prevention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention by use of a pulsatile left ventricular assist device: baptism of fire of the iVAC2L device: a case report.

Authors:  Alexander Samol; Stefanie Schmidt; Melanie Zeyse; Marcus Wiemer
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-24

10.  Can we have a rationalized selection of intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the catheterization laboratory?

Authors:  Giulio Russo; Francesco Burzotta; Cristina Aurigemma; Daniela Pedicino; Enrico Romagnoli; Carlo Trani
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.