Literature DB >> 22146791

Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome.

Fredrik Strömqvist1, Bo Jönsson, Björn Strömqvist.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most frequent operations on the spine today. The most common complication seems to be a peroperative dural lesion. There are few prospective studies on this complication regarding incidence and effect on long-term outcome; this is the background for the current study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Swespine, the Swedish Spine Register documents the majority (>80%) of lumbar spine operations in Sweden today. Within the framework of this register, totally 3,699 operations for spinal stenosis during a 5-year period were studied regarding complications and 1-year postoperative outcome. Mean patient age was 66 (37-92) years and 44% were males. Fourteen percent were smokers and 19% had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of a peroperative dural lesion was 7.4%, 8.5% of patients undergoing decompressive surgery only and 5.5% of patients undergoing decompressive surgery + fusion (p < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis demonstrated that (high) age (p < 0.0004), previous surgery (p < 0.036) and smoking (p < 0.049) were significantly predictive factors for dural lesions. An odds ratio estimate demonstrated an age-related risk increase with 2.7% per year. The risk for dural lesions also increased with number of levels decompressed. The 1-year outcome was identical in the two groups with and without a dural lesion.
CONCLUSION: A dural lesion was seen in 7.4% of decompressive operations for spinal stenosis. High age, previous surgery and smoking were risk factors for sustaining a lesion, which, however, did not affect the 1-year outcome negatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22146791      PMCID: PMC3337897          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Incidental durotomy in spine surgery.

Authors:  F P Cammisa; F P Girardi; P K Sangani; H K Parvataneni; S Cadag; H S Sandhu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The histomorphologic sequence of dural repair. Observations in the canine model.

Authors:  J E Cain; W C Lauerman; H G Rosenthal; M J Broom; R R Jacobs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J D Loeser; S J Bigos; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Closed subarachnoid drainage for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after an operation on the spine.

Authors:  S H Kitchel; F J Eismont; B A Green
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy.

Authors:  A A Jones; J L Stambough; R A Balderston; R H Rothman; R E Booth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  D Stolke; W P Sollmann; V Seifert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery.

Authors:  F J Eismont; S W Wiesel; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Annertz; C Sjöberg; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Patient outcomes after reoperation on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  G Stewart; B L Sachs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  J A Turner; M Ersek; L Herron; R Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Christian Herren; Rolf Sobottke; Anne F Mannion; Thomas Zweig; Everard Munting; Philippe Otten; Tim Pigott; Jan Siewe; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Everard Munting; Christoph Röder; Rolf Sobottke; Daniel Dietrich; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; T De Silva; A Uneri; J Goerres; M Jacobson; M Ketcha; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J-P Wolinsky; J L Prince; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mao Li; Huilin Yang; Genlin Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].

Authors:  A Korge; C Mehren; S Ruetten
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The effect of incidental dural lesions on outcome after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: results of a multi-center study with 800 patients.

Authors:  Ralph Kothe; M Quante; N Engler; F Heider; J Kneißl; S Pirchner; C Siepe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Time spent per patient in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Authors:  Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; R Chaloupka; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.