Literature DB >> 12750673

Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces.

Petra Schmage1, Ibrahim Nergiz, Wolfram Herrmann, Mutlu Ozcan.   

Abstract

With the increase in adult orthodontic treatment comes the need to find a reliable method for bonding orthodontic brackets onto metal or ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. In this study, shear bond strength and surface roughness tests were used to examine the effect of 4 different surface conditioning methods: fine diamond bur, sandblasting, 5% hydrofluoric acid, and silica coating for bonding metal brackets to ceramic surfaces of feldspathic porcelain. Sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid were further tested after silane application. A total of 120 ceramic disc samples were produced, and 50 were used for surface roughness measurements. The glazed ceramic surfaces were used as controls. Metal brackets were bonded to the ceramic substrates with a self-curing composite. The samples were stored in 0.9% NaCl solution for 24 hours and then thermocycled (5000 times, 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C, 30 seconds). Shear bond tests were performed with a universal testing device, and the results were statistically analyzed. Chemical surface conditioning with either hydrofluoric acid (4.3 microm) or silicatization (4.4 microm) resulted in significantly lower surface roughness than mechanical conditioning (9.3 microm, diamond bur; 9.7 microm, sandblasting) (P <.001). The surface roughness values reflect the mean peak-and-valley distances. The bond strengths of the brackets bonded to the ceramic surfaces treated by hydrofluoric acid with and without silane (12.2 and 14.7 MPa, respectively), silicatization (14.9 MPa), and sandblasting with silane (15.8 MPa) were significantly higher (P <.001) than those treated by mechanical roughening with fine diamond burs (1.6 MPa) or sandblasting (2.8 MPa). The highest bond strength values were obtained with sandblasting and silicatization with silane or hydrofluoric acid without silane; these fulfilled the required threshold. The use of silane after hydrofluoric acid etching did not increase the bond strength. Diamond roughening and sandblasting showed the highest surface roughness; they can damage the ceramic surface. Acid etching gave acceptable results for clinical use, but the health risks should be considered. The silicatization technique has the potential to replace the other methods; yet cohesive failures were observed in the ceramic during removal of the brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750673     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602569110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  40 in total

1.  Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment.

Authors:  Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; José María Barrera-Mora; José María Llamas-Carreras; Enrique Solano-Reina; D Rodríguez; F J Gil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics.

Authors:  Haluk Baris Kara; A Nilgun Ozturk; Filiz Aykent; Ozlem Koc; Bora Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic.

Authors:  Haluk Baris Kara; Erhan Dilber; Ozlem Koc; A Nilgun Ozturk; Mehmet Bulbul
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Scanning Electron Microscope Comparative Evaluation of Feldspathic Porcelain Surfaces under Irradiation by Different Powers of Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashem Hosseini; Farhad Sobouti; Ardavan Etemadi; Nasim Chiniforush; Stephane Ayoub Bouraima
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

5.  Biomechanical evaluation between orthodontic attachment and three different materials after various surface treatments: A three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.

Authors:  İrem Kurt; Zafer Cavit Çehreli; Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı; Çağla Şar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material.

Authors:  Shaymaa E Elsaka
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  The Effect of Fractional CO2 Laser Irradiation on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Feldspathic Porcelain.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Alireza Boruziniat; Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour; Mehrnoosh Alirezaei
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

9.  Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive : Influence of various surface treatment methods.

Authors:  Zhe-Chen Zhang; Yu-Fen Qian; Yi-Ming Yang; Qi-Ping Feng; Gang Shen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured selenium compacts for anti-cancer orthopedic applications.

Authors:  Phong Tran; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.