Literature DB >> 22139814

Diagnosing imputation models by applying target analyses to posterior replicates of completed data.

Yulei He1, Alan M Zaslavsky.   

Abstract

Multiple imputation fills in missing data with posterior predictive draws from imputation models. To assess the adequacy of imputation models, we can compare completed data with their replicates simulated under the imputation model. We apply analyses of substantive interest to both datasets and use posterior predictive checks of the differences of these estimates to quantify the evidence of model inadequacy. We can further integrate out the imputed missing data and their replicates over the completed-data analyses to reduce variance in the comparison. In many cases, the checking procedure can be easily implemented using standard imputation software by treating re-imputations under the model as posterior predictive replicates. Thus, it can be applied for non-Bayesian imputation methods. We also sketch several strategies for applying the method in the context of practical imputation analyses. We illustrate the method using two real data applications and study its property using a simulation.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22139814      PMCID: PMC4233994          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis.

Authors:  S van Buuren; H C Boshuizen; D L Knook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications.

Authors:  D B Rubin; N Schenker
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models.

Authors:  Nicholas J Horton; Ken P Kleinman
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.710

4.  Multiple imputation: review of theory, implementation and software.

Authors:  Ofer Harel; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.

Authors:  Stef van Buuren
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data.

Authors:  L-M Yu; Andrea Burton; Oliver Rivero-Arias
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Prognostic significance of the S-phase fraction of light-chain-restricted cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (cIg) positive plasma cells in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group treatment trial E9486.

Authors:  M C Trendle; T Leong; R A Kyle; J A Katzmann; M M Oken; N E Kay; B G Van Ness; P R Greipp
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 8.  Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES.

Authors:  J Barnard; X L Meng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Biological and prognostic significance of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosome 13 abnormalities (delta13) in multiple myeloma: an eastern cooperative oncology group study.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Gordon W Dewald; Richard J Bailey; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Emily A Blood; S Vincent Rajkumar; Neil E Kay; Brian Van Ness; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Activating mutations of N- and K-ras in multiple myeloma show different clinical associations: analysis of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III Trial.

Authors:  P Liu; T Leong; L Quam; D Billadeau; N E Kay; P Greipp; R A Kyle; M M Oken; B Van Ness
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  7 in total

1.  Limitations in Using Multiple Imputation to Harmonize Individual Participant Data for Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Juned Siddique; Peter J de Chavez; George Howe; Gracelyn Cruden; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-02

2.  Multiple imputation for harmonizing longitudinal non-commensurate measures in individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juned Siddique; Jerome P Reiter; Ahnalee Brincks; Robert D Gibbons; Catherine M Crespi; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research.

Authors:  Panteha Hayati Rezvan; Katherine J Lee; Julie A Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Diagnosing problems with imputation models using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: a simulation study.

Authors:  Cattram D Nguyen; John B Carlin; Katherine J Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Sensitivity analysis in multiple imputation in effectiveness studies of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Aureliano Crameri; Agnes von Wyl; Margit Koemeda; Peter Schulthess; Volker Tschuschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-27

6.  Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study.

Authors:  Cattram D Nguyen; John B Carlin; Katherine J Lee
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-23

7.  Androgens In Men Study (AIMS): protocol for meta-analyses of individual participant data investigating associations of androgens with health outcomes in men.

Authors:  Bu Beng Yeap; Ross James Marriott; Robert J Adams; Leen Antonio; Christie M Ballantyne; Shalender Bhasin; Peggy M Cawthon; David John Couper; Adrian S Dobs; Leon Flicker; Magnus Karlsson; Sean A Martin; Alvin M Matsumoto; Dan Mellström; Paul E Norman; Claes Ohlsson; Eric S Orwoll; Terence W O'Neill; Molly M Shores; Thomas G Travison; Dirk Vanderschueren; Gary A Wittert; Frederick C W Wu; Kevin Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.