Literature DB >> 17621470

Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data.

L-M Yu1, Andrea Burton, Oliver Rivero-Arias.   

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that multiple imputation (MI) methods properly handle the uncertainty of missing data over single imputation methods. Several standard statistical software packages, such as SAS, R and STATA, have standard procedures or user-written programs to perform MI. The performance of these packages is generally acceptable for most types of data. However, it is unclear whether these applications are appropriate for imputing data with a large proportion of zero values resulting in a semi-continuous distribution. In addition, it is not clear whether the use of these applications is suitable when the distribution of the data needs to be preserved for subsequent analysis. This article reports the findings of a simulation study carried out to evaluate the performance of the MI procedures for handling semi-continuous data within these statistical packages. Complete resource use data on 1060 participants from a large randomized clinical trial were used as the simulation population from which 500 bootstrap samples were obtained and missing data imposed. The findings of this study showed differences in the performance of the MI programs when imputing semi-continuous data. Caution should be exercised when deciding which program should perform MI on this type of data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17621470     DOI: 10.1177/0962280206074464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  27 in total

1.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?

Authors:  Melissa J Azur; Elizabeth A Stuart; Constantine Frangakis; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  Multiple Imputation for Incomplete Data in Environmental Epidemiology Research.

Authors:  Prince Addo Allotey; Ofer Harel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2019-06

3.  The HCUP SID Imputation Project: Improving Statistical Inferences for Health Disparities Research by Imputing Missing Race Data.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Wei Zhang; Stephen Lyman; Yihe Huang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Uterine artery embolization versus abdominal myomectomy: a long-term clinical outcome comparison.

Authors:  Anand Narayan; Adrea S Lee; George P Kuo; Neil Powe; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  PROMIS Global Health item nonresponse: is it better to impute missing item responses before computing T-scores?

Authors:  Nicolas R Thompson; Irene L Katzan; Ryan D Honomichl; Brittany R Lapin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Diagnosing imputation models by applying target analyses to posterior replicates of completed data.

Authors:  Yulei He; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Chemoradiation Vs Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Comparative Analysis Using the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Dharam Kaushik; Hanzhang Wang; Joel Michalek; Michael A Liss; Qianqian Liu; Richa Priya Jha; Robert S Svatek; Ahmed M Mansour
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.

Authors:  Andrea Marshall; Douglas G Altman; Roger L Holder
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  How Does Caregiver Well-Being Relate to Perceived Quality of Care in Patients With Cancer? Exploring Associations and Pathways.

Authors:  Kristin Litzelman; Erin E Kent; Michelle Mollica; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of models for analyzing two-group, cross-sectional data with a Gaussian outcome subject to a detection limit.

Authors:  Ryan E Wiegand; Charles E Rose; John M Karon
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.