Literature DB >> 22138632

Stimulating deep cortical structures with the batwing coil: how to determine the intensity for transcranial magnetic stimulation using coil-cortex distance.

Weidong Cai1, Jobi S George, Christopher D Chambers, Mark G Stokes, Frederick Verbruggen, Adam R Aron.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience to probe non-motor cortical regions. A key question for such studies is the choice of stimulation intensity. Early studies used a simple metric such as 115% of motor threshold (MT) for non-motor regions; where MT is the stimulation intensity required to elicit a particular amplitude of motor evoked potential or visible muscle twitch when the coil is placed over primary motor cortex. Recently, however, it was demonstrated that this simple metric for stimulation of non-motor regions is inadequate - it could lead to over or under-stimulation depending on the distance between the coil and the cortex. Instead, a method was developed to scale the motor threshold based on coil-cortex distance, at least for standard figure-of-eight stimulating coils. Here we validate the same method for a 'batwing coil', which is designed to stimulate deeper cortical structures such as the medial frontal cortex. We modulated coil-cortex distance within-participant by inserting spacers of different thickness between coil and scalp. We then measured MT at each spacer. We show that for every millimeter between coil and scalp an additional 1.4% of TMS output is required to induce an equivalent level of brain stimulation at the motor cortex. Using this parameter we describe a linear function to adjust MT for future studies of non-motor regions-of-interest using the batwing coil. This is the first study to demonstrate the effects of coil-cortical distance on stimulation efficiency via a monophasic system using a batwing coil.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22138632      PMCID: PMC3633572          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

1.  The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex.

Authors:  K A McConnell; Z Nahas; A Shastri; J P Lorberbaum; F A Kozel; D E Bohning; M S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; A Pascual-Leone; O Felician; S Camposano; J P Keenan; W L Thompson; G Ganis; K E Sukel; N M Alpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; L G Cohen; M Panizza; J Nilsson; B J Roth; M Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Christopher D Chambers; Ian C Gould; Tracy R Henderson; Natasha E Janko; Nicholas B Allen; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The physiological basis of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

7.  Reliability of the 'observation of movement' method for determining motor threshold using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Alice Varnava; Mark G Stokes; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

9.  Induction of visual extinction by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; E Gomez-Tortosa; J Grafman; D Alway; P Nichelli; M Hallett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Christopher D Chambers; Ian C Gould; Therese English; Elizabeth McNaught; Odette McDonald; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  11 in total

1.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An Essential Role of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Response Inhibition Predicted by Parcellation-Based Network.

Authors:  Takahiro Osada; Shinri Ohta; Akitoshi Ogawa; Masaki Tanaka; Akimitsu Suda; Koji Kamagata; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki; Yasushi Shimo; Nobutaka Hattori; Takahiro Shimizu; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Seiki Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Anthony T Barker; Martynas Dervinis; Frederick Verbruggen; Leah Maizey; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Therapeutic noninvasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Authors:  Stephanie S Buss; Peter J Fried; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 5.  The Effect of Cerebellar rTMS on Modulating Motor Dysfunction in Neurological Disorders: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yifei Xia; Mingqi Wang; Yulian Zhu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.648

6.  Deep continuous theta burst stimulation of the operculo-insular cortex selectively affects Aδ-fibre heat pain.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Maxime Algoet; André Mouraux
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation: the role of coil geometry and tissue depth.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Elise Lesage; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Frontosubthalamic Circuits for Control of Action and Cognition.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Damian M Herz; Peter Brown; Birte U Forstmann; Kareem Zaghloul
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Mapping the visual brain areas susceptible to phosphene induction through brain stimulation.

Authors:  Lukas F Schaeffner; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil.

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Maximilian Schmaußer; Felix Klinger; Peter M Kreuzer; Lars Krenkel; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.