Literature DB >> 30692225

An Essential Role of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Response Inhibition Predicted by Parcellation-Based Network.

Takahiro Osada1, Shinri Ohta1, Akitoshi Ogawa1, Masaki Tanaka1, Akimitsu Suda1,2, Koji Kamagata3, Masaaki Hori3, Shigeki Aoki3, Yasushi Shimo2, Nobutaka Hattori2, Takahiro Shimizu4, Hiroyuki Enomoto5, Ritsuko Hanajima4, Yoshikazu Ugawa5, Seiki Konishi6,7,8.   

Abstract

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) features close anatomical and functional relationships with the prefrontal cortex. However, the necessity of the PPC in executive functions has been questioned. The present study used the stop-signal task to examine response inhibition, an executive function that inhibits prepotent response tendency. The brain activity and resting-state functional connectivity were measured to analyze a parcellation-based network that was aimed at identifying a candidate PPC region essential for response inhibition in humans. The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was activated during response inhibition and connected with the inferior frontal cortex and the presupplementary motor area, the two frontal regions known to be necessary for response inhibition. Next, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to test the essential role of the IPS region for response inhibition. TMS over the IPS region prolonged the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), the standard behavioral index used to evaluate stopping performance, when stimulation was applied 30-0 ms before stopping. On the contrary, stimulation over the temporoparietal junction region, an area activated during response inhibition but lacking connectivity with the two frontal regions, did not show changes in SSRT. These results indicate that the IPS identified using the parcellation-based network plays an essential role in executive functions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Based on the previous neuropsychological studies reporting no impairment in executive functions after lesions in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the necessity of PPC in executive functions has been questioned. Here, contrary to the long-lasting view, by using recently developed analysis in functional MRI ("parcellation-based network analysis"), we identified the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) region in the PPC as essential for response inhibition: one executive function to stop actions that are inaccurate in a given context. The necessity of IPS for response inhibition was further tested by an interventional technique of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Stimulation to the IPS disrupted the performance of stopping. Our findings suggest that the IPS plays essential roles in executive functions.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/392509-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical parcellation; executive function; posterior parietal cortex; response inhibition; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30692225      PMCID: PMC6435821          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2244-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  95 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; V Walsh; J Rothwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.

Authors:  S Kastner; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Luke Clark; Adrian M Owen; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Paul C Fletcher; Ed T Bullmore; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Go - no go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans.

Authors:  E A Drewe
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes.

Authors:  D T Stuss; B Levine; M P Alexander; J Hong; C Palumbo; L Hamer; K J Murphy; D Izukawa
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; E A Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand motor area in humans.

Authors:  R Hanajima; Y Ugawa; K Machii; H Mochizuki; Y Terao; H Enomoto; T Furubayashi; Y Shiio; H Uesugi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; Maurits W van der Molen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-02
View more
  15 in total

1.  Disentangling the role of posterior parietal cortex in response inhibition.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Sumitash Jana
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dual-tDCS over the right prefrontal cortex does not modulate stop-signal task performance.

Authors:  Maximilian A Friehs; Lisa Brauner; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural Changes in Reward Processing Following Approach Avoidance Training for Depression.

Authors:  Jessica Bomyea; Soo-Hee Choi; Alison Sweet; Murray Stein; Martin Paulus; Charles Taylor
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Perceptual Uncertainty Alternates Top-down and Bottom-up Fronto-Temporal Network Signaling during Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Kaho Tsumura; Reiko Shintaki; Masaki Takeda; Junichi Chikazoe; Kiyoshi Nakahara; Koji Jimura
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Ricci Hannah; Vignesh Muralidharan; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Advantages of Using Both Voxel- and Surface-based Morphometry in Cortical Morphology Analysis: A Review of Various Applications.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Osamu Abe; Akifumi Hagiwara; Shohei Fujita; Koji Kamagata; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki; Takahiro Osada; Seiki Konishi; Yoshitaka Masutani; Hajime Sakamoto; Yasuaki Sakano; Shinsuke Kyogoku; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.760

8.  Functional, anatomical and diffusion tensor MRI study of radiology expertise.

Authors:  David J Ouellette; Eric Van Staalduinen; Syed H Hussaini; Sindhuja T Govindarajan; Patricia Stefancin; Dan-Ling Hsu; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low-frequency parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Emily M Beydler; Madeline Goodwin; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Long-Term Cocaine Self-administration Produces Structural Brain Changes That Correlate With Altered Cognition.

Authors:  Hank P Jedema; Xiaowei Song; Howard J Aizenstein; Alexandra R Bonner; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang; Charles W Bradberry
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.