Literature DB >> 28384751

A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: III. Theoretical Coherence of the Pause Marker with Speech Processing Deficits in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Lawrence D Shriberg1, Edythe A Strand2, Marios Fourakis1, Kathy J Jakielski3, Sheryl D Hall1, Heather B Karlsson1, Heather L Mabie1, Jane L McSweeny1, Christie M Tilkens1, David L Wilson1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Previous articles in this supplement described rationale for and development of the pause marker (PM), a diagnostic marker of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), and studies supporting its validity and reliability. The present article assesses the theoretical coherence of the PM with speech processing deficits in CAS. Method: PM and other scores were obtained for 264 participants in 6 groups: CAS in idiopathic, neurogenetic, and complex neurodevelopmental disorders; adult-onset apraxia of speech (AAS) consequent to stroke and primary progressive apraxia of speech; and idiopathic speech delay.
Results: Participants with CAS and AAS had significantly lower scores than typically speaking reference participants and speech delay controls on measures posited to assess representational and transcoding processes. Representational deficits differed between CAS and AAS groups, with support for both underspecified linguistic representations and memory/access deficits in CAS, but for only the latter in AAS. CAS-AAS similarities in the age-sex standardized percentages of occurrence of the most frequent type of inappropriate pauses (abrupt) and significant differences in the standardized occurrence of appropriate pauses were consistent with speech processing findings. Conclusions: Results support the hypotheses of core representational and transcoding speech processing deficits in CAS and theoretical coherence of the PM's pause-speech elements with these deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28384751      PMCID: PMC5548088          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  30 in total

1.  Auditory and phonetic perception of vowels in children with apraxic speech disorders.

Authors:  Ben Maassen; Paul Groenen; Thom Crul
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 2.  The role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance.

Authors:  Katherine Tschida; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment.

Authors:  L D Shriberg; J B Tomblin; J L McSweeny
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Reliance on auditory feedback in children with childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Tiffany P Hogan; Anthony J Guarino; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Mismatch negativity responses in children with a diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS).

Authors:  Karen Froud; Reem Khamis-Dakwar
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Cognitive Functions in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Lian Nijland; Hayo Terband; Ben Maassen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS).

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Marios Fourakis; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Lohmeier; Jane L McSweeny; Nancy L Potter; Alison R Scheer-Cohen; Edythe A Strand; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Oral Articulatory Control in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Maria I Grigos; Aviva Moss; Ying Lu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: II. Validity Studies of the Pause Marker.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Cortical thickness in children receiving intensive therapy for idiopathic apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Darren S Kadis; Debra Goshulak; Aravind Namasivayam; Margit Pukonen; Robert Kroll; Luc F De Nil; Elizabeth W Pang; Jason P Lerch
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: I. Development and Description of the Pause Marker.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: IV. The Pause Marker Index.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Changes in movement transitions across a practice period in childhood apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Maria I Grigos; Julie Case
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Protocol for the Connected Speech Transcription of Children with Speech Disorders: An Example from Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Catherine Barrett; Patricia McCabe; Sarah Masso; Jonathan Preston
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 0.849

5.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: II. Validity Studies of the Pause Marker.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  A frequent acoustic sign of speech motor delay (SMD).

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Yvonne E Wren
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Estimates of the Prevalence of Speech and Motor Speech Disorders in Youth With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Authors:  Adriane L Baylis; Lawrence D Shriberg
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Initial studies of the phenotype and persistence of speech motor delay (SMD).

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Thomas F Campbell; Heather L Mabie; Jenny H McGlothlin
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Estimates of the prevalence of speech and motor speech disorders in persons with complex neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Kathy J Jakielski; Heather L Mabie
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 10.  Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kristen M Allison; Claire Cordella; Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.