OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal pro-ANP (NT-proANP), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for mortality and cardiovascular events in the general population in the absence of overt heart failure (HF). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We identified a community-based cohort of 2042 individuals. Those with stage C or D HF (n=45) and renal insufficiency (n=6) were excluded from the current study. Of the remaining individuals, 1769 (89%) underwent echocardiography and measurement of plasma ANP, NT-proANP, and NT-proBNP. Participants were followed up from January 1, 1997, to May 1, 2009, for mortality, HF, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident; median follow-up was 9 years. RESULTS: After adjustment for conventional clinical risk factors, NT-proANP had significant predictive value for mortality but not for HF, MI, or cerebrovascular accident, whereas ANP lacked any predictive value. The predictive value of NT-proANP for mortality was attenuated after adjustment for structural and functional cardiac abnormalities. In contrast, NT-proBNP had predictive value for mortality, HF, and MI after adjustment for conventional risk factors and retained significance for mortality and HF after adjustment for structural and functional cardiac abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that NT-proBNP is a more robust cardiac biomarker compared with ANP or NT-proANP and is independently predictive of mortality and HF in the general population free of overt HF.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), N-terminal pro-ANP (NT-proANP), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for mortality and cardiovascular events in the general population in the absence of overt heart failure (HF). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We identified a community-based cohort of 2042 individuals. Those with stage C or D HF (n=45) and renal insufficiency (n=6) were excluded from the current study. Of the remaining individuals, 1769 (89%) underwent echocardiography and measurement of plasma ANP, NT-proANP, and NT-proBNP. Participants were followed up from January 1, 1997, to May 1, 2009, for mortality, HF, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular accident; median follow-up was 9 years. RESULTS: After adjustment for conventional clinical risk factors, NT-proANP had significant predictive value for mortality but not for HF, MI, or cerebrovascular accident, whereas ANP lacked any predictive value. The predictive value of NT-proANP for mortality was attenuated after adjustment for structural and functional cardiac abnormalities. In contrast, NT-proBNP had predictive value for mortality, HF, and MI after adjustment for conventional risk factors and retained significance for mortality and HF after adjustment for structural and functional cardiac abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that NT-proBNP is a more robust cardiac biomarker compared with ANP or NT-proANP and is independently predictive of mortality and HF in the general population free of overt HF.
Authors: Alan S Maisel; Padma Krishnaswamy; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Philippe Duc; Torbjørn Omland; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Alan H B Wu; Paul Clopton; Philippe G Steg; Arne Westheim; Catherine Wold Knudsen; Alberto Perez; Radmila Kazanegra; Howard C Herrmann; Peter A McCullough Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven J Jacobsen; Douglas W Mahoney; Margaret M Redfield; Kent R Bailey; John C Burnett; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: A Lerman; R J Gibbons; R J Rodeheffer; K R Bailey; L J McKinley; D M Heublein; J C Burnett Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter A McCullough; Richard M Nowak; James McCord; Judd E Hollander; Howard C Herrmann; Philippe G Steg; Philippe Duc; Arne Westheim; Torbjørn Omland; Cathrine Wold Knudsen; Alan B Storrow; William T Abraham; Sumant Lamba; Alan H B Wu; Alberto Perez; Paul Clopton; Padma Krishnaswamy; Radmila Kazanegra; Alan S Maisel Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Steven J Jacobsen; John C Burnett; Douglas W Mahoney; Kent R Bailey; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Eric P Leip; Torbjorn Omland; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul A Heidenreich; Matthew A Gubens; Gregg C Fonarow; Marvin A Konstam; Lynne W Stevenson; Paul G Shekelle Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Allison M Pritchett; Steven J Jacobsen; Douglas W Mahoney; Richard J Rodeheffer; Kent R Bailey; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Jeson Sangaralingham; Paul M McKie; Tomoko Ichiki; Christopher G Scott; Denise M Heublein; Horng H Chen; Kent R Bailey; Margaret M Redfield; Richard J Rodeheffer; John C Burnett Journal: Hypertension Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Naveen L Pereira; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Christopher G Scott; Gregory D Jenkins; Naresh Prodduturi; Yubo Chai; Timothy M Olson; Richard J Rodeheffer; Margaret M Redfield; Richard M Weinshilboum; John C Burnett Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2014-12-01
Authors: Lisa C Costello-Boerrigter; Harald Lapp; Guido Boerrigter; Amir Lerman; Alexander Bufe; Fima Macheret; Denise M Heublein; Catherine Larue; John C Burnett Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Shawn H Reginauld; Valentina Cannone; Seethalakshmi Iyer; Christopher Scott; Kent Bailey; Jacob Schaefer; Yang Chen; S Jeson Sangaralingham; John C Burnett Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 12.544