| Literature DB >> 31183637 |
Michael Sarhene1,2,3, Yili Wang1,2,3, Jing Wei1,2,3, Yuting Huang1,2,3, Min Li1,2,3, Lan Li1,2,3, Enoch Acheampong2, Zhou Zhengcan1,2, Qin Xiaoyan1,2, Xu Yunsheng1,2, Mao Jingyuan1, Gao Xiumei2, Fan Guanwei4,5.
Abstract
Despite the enhanced knowledge of the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), it still remains a serious syndrome with substantial morbidity, mortality, and frequent hospitalizations. These are due to the current improvements in other cardiovascular diseases (like myocardial infarction), the aging population, and growing prevalence of comorbidities. Biomarker-guided management has brought a new dimension in prognostication, diagnosis, and therapy options. Following the recommendation of natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal-proBNP), many other biomarkers have been thoroughly studied to reflect different pathophysiological processes (such as fibrosis, inflammation, myocardial injury, and remodeling) in HF and some of them (like cardiac troponins, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2, and galectin 3) have subsequently been recommended to aid in the diagnosis and prognostication in HF. Consequently, multi-marker approach has also been approved owing to the varied nature of HF syndrome. In this review, we discussed the guidelines available for HF biomarkers, procedures for evaluating novel markers, and the utilities of both emerging and established biomarkers for risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of HF in the clinics. We later looked at how the rapidly emerging field-OMICs, can help transform HF biomarkers discoveries and establishment.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Heart failure; Myocardial fibrosis; Myocardial injury; Natriuretic peptides; Omics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31183637 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-019-09807-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Fail Rev ISSN: 1382-4147 Impact factor: 4.214