Yun Feng Rui1, Pauline Po Yee Lui, Yuk Wai Lee, Kai Ming Chan. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Rm. 74025, 5/F, Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China. ruiyunfeng@126.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical reattachment of tendon to bone often fails due to regeneration failure of the specialised tendon-bone junction (TBJ). The use of mesenchymal stem cells for TBJ regeneration has been reported with promising results. Tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) with high proliferative and multi-lineage differentiation potential have been isolated. As stem cells residing in tendons, TDSCs can be considered a new cell source for TBJ repair. Bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) is a potent osteogenic factor with roles in normal bone healing and pathological ectopic bone formation in soft tissues. The use of BMP-2 to promote TBJ repair has been well reported. This study aimed to compare TDSCs to the gold standard bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) with respect to osteogenic response to BMP-2 in vitro. METHOD: The clonogenicity and multi-differentiation potential of TDSCs and BMSCs were identified by colony-forming-unit assay, osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation assays. Their osteogenic response to BMP-2 in vitro was examined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) cytochemical staining, ALP activity assay and Alizarin red S staining of calcium nodule formation. Messenger RNA (mRNA) and BMP receptor (types IA, IB and II) protein expression were examined by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting. RESULTS: Our results showed that both TDSCs and BMSCs exhibited stem cell properties, including clonogenicity and multi-differentiation potential. TDSCs expressed higher mRNA and protein levels of BMP receptors IA, IB and II. They also exhibited higher osteogenic differentiation with and without BMP-2 stimulation compared with BMSCs. CONCLUSIONS: TDSCs with/without BMP-2 might be an attractive source for TBJ repair compared with BMSCs.
PURPOSE: Surgical reattachment of tendon to bone often fails due to regeneration failure of the specialised tendon-bone junction (TBJ). The use of mesenchymal stem cells for TBJ regeneration has been reported with promising results. Tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) with high proliferative and multi-lineage differentiation potential have been isolated. As stem cells residing in tendons, TDSCs can be considered a new cell source for TBJ repair. Bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP-2) is a potent osteogenic factor with roles in normal bone healing and pathological ectopic bone formation in soft tissues. The use of BMP-2 to promote TBJ repair has been well reported. This study aimed to compare TDSCs to the gold standard bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) with respect to osteogenic response to BMP-2 in vitro. METHOD: The clonogenicity and multi-differentiation potential of TDSCs and BMSCs were identified by colony-forming-unit assay, osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation assays. Their osteogenic response to BMP-2 in vitro was examined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) cytochemical staining, ALP activity assay and Alizarin red S staining of calcium nodule formation. Messenger RNA (mRNA) and BMP receptor (types IA, IB and II) protein expression were examined by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting. RESULTS: Our results showed that both TDSCs and BMSCs exhibited stem cell properties, including clonogenicity and multi-differentiation potential. TDSCs expressed higher mRNA and protein levels of BMP receptors IA, IB and II. They also exhibited higher osteogenic differentiation with and without BMP-2 stimulation compared with BMSCs. CONCLUSIONS: TDSCs with/without BMP-2 might be an attractive source for TBJ repair compared with BMSCs.
Authors: Yun-Feng Rui; Pauline Po Yee Lui; Gang Li; Sai Chuen Fu; Yuk Wa Lee; Kai Ming Chan Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Yanming Bi; Driss Ehirchiou; Tina M Kilts; Colette A Inkson; Mildred C Embree; Wataru Sonoyama; Li Li; Arabella I Leet; Byoung-Moo Seo; Li Zhang; Songtao Shi; Marian F Young Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-09-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ingo Grafe; Stefanie Alexander; Jonathan R Peterson; Taylor Nicholas Snider; Benjamin Levi; Brendan Lee; Yuji Mishina Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Sofia Avnet; Gemma Di Pompo; Tokuhiro Chano; Costantino Errani; Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Robert J Gillies; Davide Maria Donati; Nicola Baldini Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 7.396