Literature DB >> 22638826

Variability of individual genetic load: consequences for the detection of inbreeding depression.

Gwendal Restoux1, Priscille Huot de Longchamp, Bruno Fady, Etienne K Klein.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is a key factor affecting the persistence of natural populations, particularly when they are fragmented. In species with mixed mating systems, inbreeding depression can be estimated at the population level by regressing the average progeny fitness by the selfing rate of their mothers. We applied this method using simulated populations to investigate how population genetic parameters can affect the detection power of inbreeding depression. We simulated individual selfing rates and genetic loads from which we computed fitness values. The regression method yielded high statistical power, inbreeding depression being detected as significant (5 % level) in 92 % of the simulations. High individual variation in selfing rate and high mean genetic load led to better detection of inbreeding depression while high among-individual variation in genetic load made it more difficult to detect inbreeding depression. For a constant sampling effort, increasing the number of progenies while decreasing the number of individuals per progeny enhanced the detection power of inbreeding depression. We discuss the implication of among-mother variability of genetic load and selfing rate on inbreeding depression studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638826     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-012-9656-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  33 in total

1.  Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Authors:  Alice A Winn; Elizabeth Elle; Susan Kalisz; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Christopher G Eckert; Carol Goodwillie; Mark O Johnston; David A Moeller; Richard H Ree; Risa D Sargent; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best.

Authors:  Josephine Pemberton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: a comparison of three populations.

Authors:  Carol Goodwillie; Mary Catherine Knight
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates?

Authors:  P O Cheptou; A Mathias
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS.

Authors:  Brian C Husband; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Heterozygosity-fitness correlations among wild populations of European tree frog (Hyla arborea) detect fixation load.

Authors:  E Luquet; P David; J-P Lena; P Joly; L Konecny; C Dufresnes; N Perrin; S Plenet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  One step beyond lethal equivalents: characterization of deleterious loci in the rapid cycling Brassica rapa L. base population.

Authors:  M Lascoux; J K Lee
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Density-dependent self-fertilization and male versus hermaphrodite siring success in an androdioecious plant.

Authors:  Sarah M Eppley; John R Pannell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.