OBJECTIVE: We describe the systematic approach to incidental findings (IFs) used at the Mind Research Network (MRN) where all MRI scans receive neuroradiologist interpretation and participants are provided results. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, 8,545 MRI scans were acquired by 45 researchers. As mandated by MRN's external institutional review board, all structural sequences were evaluated by a clinical neuroradiologist who generated a report that included recommendations for referral if indicated. Investigators received a copy of their participants' reports, which were also mailed to participants unless they specifically declined. To better understand the impact of the radiology review process, a financial analysis was completed in addition to a follow-up phone survey to characterize participant perceptions regarding receiving their MRI scan results. RESULTS: The radiologist identified IFs in 34% of the 4,447 participants. Of those with IFs (n = 1,518), the radiologist recommended urgent or immediate referral for 2.5% and routine referral for 17%. For 80.5%, no referral was recommended. Estimated annual cost for this approach including support for the neuroradiologist, medical director, and ancillary staff is approximately $60,000 or $24/scan. The results of the retrospective phone survey showed that 92% of participants appreciated receiving their MRI report, and the majority stated it increased their likelihood of volunteering for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing IFs in a cost-effective and consistent manner is possible by adopting a policy that provides neuroradiology interpretation and offers participant assistance with clinical follow-up when necessary. Our experience suggests that an ethical, institution-wide approach to IFs can be implemented with minimal investigator burden.
OBJECTIVE: We describe the systematic approach to incidental findings (IFs) used at the Mind Research Network (MRN) where all MRI scans receive neuroradiologist interpretation and participants are provided results. METHODS: From 2004 to 2011, 8,545 MRI scans were acquired by 45 researchers. As mandated by MRN's external institutional review board, all structural sequences were evaluated by a clinical neuroradiologist who generated a report that included recommendations for referral if indicated. Investigators received a copy of their participants' reports, which were also mailed to participants unless they specifically declined. To better understand the impact of the radiology review process, a financial analysis was completed in addition to a follow-up phone survey to characterize participant perceptions regarding receiving their MRI scan results. RESULTS: The radiologist identified IFs in 34% of the 4,447 participants. Of those with IFs (n = 1,518), the radiologist recommended urgent or immediate referral for 2.5% and routine referral for 17%. For 80.5%, no referral was recommended. Estimated annual cost for this approach including support for the neuroradiologist, medical director, and ancillary staff is approximately $60,000 or $24/scan. The results of the retrospective phone survey showed that 92% of participants appreciated receiving their MRI report, and the majority stated it increased their likelihood of volunteering for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing IFs in a cost-effective and consistent manner is possible by adopting a policy that provides neuroradiology interpretation and offers participant assistance with clinical follow-up when necessary. Our experience suggests that an ethical, institution-wide approach to IFs can be implemented with minimal investigator burden.
Authors: Nicholas M Orme; Joel G Fletcher; Hassan A Siddiki; W Scott Harmsen; Megan M O'Byrne; John D Port; William J Tremaine; Henry C Pitot; Elizabeth G McFarland; Marguerite E Robinson; Barbara A Koenig; Bernard F King; Susan M Wolf Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-09-27
Authors: Meike W Vernooij; M Arfan Ikram; Hervé L Tanghe; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Albert Hofman; Gabriel P Krestin; Wiro J Niessen; Monique M B Breteler; Aad van der Lugt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven C Cramer; Jennifer Wu; Joseph A Hanson; Sarvenaz Nouri; Diraj Karnani; Tony M Chuang; Vu Le Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-01-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Henry J Bockholt; Mark Scully; William Courtney; Srinivas Rachakonda; Adam Scott; Arvind Caprihan; Jill Fries; Ravi Kalyanam; Judith M Segall; Raul de la Garza; Susan Lane; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond Journal: J Law Med Ethics Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Andrew P Klein; Julie E Tetzlaff; Joshua M Bonis; Lindsay D Nelson; Andrew R Mayer; Daniel L Huber; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Vincent P Mathews; John L Ulmer; Grant P Sinson; Andrew S Nencka; Kevin M Koch; Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew J Saykin; John P DiFiori; Christopher C Giza; Joshua Goldman; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jason P Mihalik; Stefan M Duma; Steven Rowson; Alison Brooks; Steven P Broglio; Thomas McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Timothy B Meier Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid; Pia Erdmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Martin Langanke; Henry Völzke; Ralf Puls; Heinrich Assel; Reiner Biffar; Hans Jörgen Grabe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: John P Phillips; Caitlin Cole; John P Gluck; Jody M Shoemaker; Linda Petree; Deborah Helitzer; Ronald Schrader; Mark Holdsworth Journal: Ethics Behav Date: 2014-10-20
Authors: Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Xiaohui Yao; Sungeun Kim; Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Vijay K Ramanan; Tatiana M Foroud; Kelley M Faber; Nadeem Sarwar; Leanne M Munsie; Xiaolan Hu; Holly D Soares; Steven G Potkin; Paul M Thompson; John S K Kauwe; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; Robert C Green; Arthur W Toga; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.566