Literature DB >> 12110966

Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs.

Julien Voisin1, Yves Lamarre, C Elaine Chapman.   

Abstract

Using two-dimensional (2D) angles composed of two straight, 8-cm-long arms that formed an angle, we investigated the importance of cutaneous feedback from the exploring index finger, and proprioceptive feedback from the shoulder (scanning movements made with the outstretched arm), to the human ability to discriminate small differences in the angles. Using a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, subjects identified the larger angle in each pair explored (standard angle, 90 degrees; comparison angles, 91 degrees to 103 degrees). Subjects were tested under four experimental conditions: (1) active touch (reference condition); (2) active touch with digital anaesthesia; (3) passive touch (a computer-controlled device displaced the angle under the subject's immobile digit); and (4) passive touch with digital anaesthesia. When only proprioceptive feedback from the shoulder was available (condition 2), there was a significant increase in discrimination threshold, from 4.0 degrees in the reference condition (condition 1) to 7.2 degrees, indicating that cutaneous feedback from the exploring digit contributed to task performance. When only cutaneous feedback from the finger was available (condition 3), there was also a significant increase in threshold from 4.2 degrees in the active condition to 8.7 degrees. This suggested that proprioceptive feedback from the shoulder, potentially from a variety of deep (muscle and joint) but also cutaneous receptors, contributed to the ability to discriminate small changes in 2D angles. When both sources of feedback were eliminated (condition 4), subjects were unable to discriminate even the largest difference presented (13 degrees). The results suggest that this sensory task is truly an integrative task drawing on sensory information from two different submodalities and so, following the definition of Gibson, is haptic in nature. The results are discussed in relation to the potential neural mechanisms that might underlie a task that requires integration across two anatomically separate body parts and two distinct modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12110966     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1118-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry.

Authors:  Denise Y P Henriques; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual constancy of texture roughness in the tactile system.

Authors:  Takashi Yoshioka; James C Craig; Graham C Beck; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Frontoparietal involvement in passively guided shape and length discrimination: a comparison between subcortical stroke patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ann Van de Winckel; Nicole Wenderoth; Willy De Weerdt; Stefan Sunaert; Ron Peeters; Wim Van Hecke; Vincent Thijs; Stephan P Swinnen; Carlo Perfetti; Hilde Feys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Trajectory of contact region on the fingerpad gives the illusion of haptic shape.

Authors:  Hanifa Dostmohamed; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Guillaume Michaud; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Authors:  Myriam Levy; Stéphanie Bourgeon; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tactile acuity in the blind: a psychophysical study using a two-dimensional angle discrimination task.

Authors:  Flamine Alary; Rachel Goldstein; Marco Duquette; C Elaine Chapman; Patrice Voss; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Haptic two-dimensional angle categorization and discrimination.

Authors:  Iuliana Toderita; Stéphanie Bourgeon; Julien I A Voisin; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Deaf, blind or deaf-blind: Is touch enhanced?

Authors:  Costanza Papagno; Carlo Cecchetto; Alberto Pisoni; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.