Literature DB >> 22130620

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction are more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than distal gastric cancer.

Daniel Reim1, Ralf Gertler, Alexander Novotny, Karen Becker, Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde, Matthias Ebert, Martin Dobritz, Rupert Langer, Heinz Hoefler, Helmut Friess, Christoph Schumacher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to improve outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and gastric cancer (GC), and histopathologic response has been identified as an independent prognostic parameter in these patients. A recent meta-analysis has identified patients with AEG as benefiting more from preoperative chemotherapy than patients with GC. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to prove these findings in an experienced single-center large patient cohort because there are currently no recruiting prospective clinical trials.
METHODS: In a single center, 551 patients underwent preoperative platin-based chemotherapy followed by oncologic surgery for locally advanced AEG and GC. Pretherapeutic clinical parameters were correlated with histopathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Histopathologic response (<10% of residual tumor) was found in 130 patients (24%) and was significantly correlated with overall survival (P<0.0001). Tumor localization at the esophagogastric junction (GE junction), lower baseline cT stage, and baseline cN0 stage were significantly associated with histopathologic response (P=0.034, P=0.015, and P=0.002, respectively). In subgroup analyses, the latter two predictive parameters were confirmed only for AEG (n=378) but not for other GC (n=173). AEG patients who were pretherapeutically staged as having cT3/4, cN0 disease (n=73) were identified as the subgroup with the highest rate of histopathologic response (48%).
CONCLUSIONS: AEG is more likely to respond to preoperative chemotherapy than GC, a finding that might help identify patients who would benefit from preoperative chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22130620     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  25 in total

1.  Pathological response measured using virtual microscopic slides for gastric cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sadayuki Kawai; Tadakazu Shimoda; Takashi Nakajima; Masanori Terashima; Katsuhiro Omae; Nozomu Machida; Hirofumi Yasui
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Different regimens of perioperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma: does a triplet therapy with taxane generate a survival benefit?

Authors:  Nicole Samm; Alexander Novotny; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  The combination of alisertib, an investigational Aurora kinase A inhibitor, and docetaxel promotes cell death and reduces tumor growth in preclinical cell models of upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Vikas Sehdev; Ahmed Katsha; Jeffrey Ecsedy; Alexander Zaika; Abbes Belkhiri; Wael El-Rifai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Karen Becker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Neo-adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in gastric cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Biondi; Maria C Lirosi; Domenico D'Ugo; Valeria Fico; Riccardo Ricci; Francesco Santullo; Antonia Rizzuto; Ferdinando Cm Cananzi; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 6.  Adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer? A perspective review.

Authors:  Rebekka Schirren; Daniel Reim; Alexander R Novotny
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Determination of the optimal cutoff percentage of residual tumors to define the pathological response rate for gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy (JCOG1004-A).

Authors:  Kenichi Nakamura; Takeshi Kuwata; Tadakazu Shimoda; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Ryoji Kushima; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Post-therapeutic response evaluation by a combination of endoscopy and CT scan in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy: better than its reputation.

Authors:  Susanne Blank; Florian Lordick; Franz Bader; Maria Burian; Martin Dobritz; Lars Grenacher; Karen Becker; Wilko Weichert; Rupert Langer; Leila Sisic; Annika Stange; Dirk Jäger; Markus Büchler; Thomas Bruckner; Jörg Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Susanne Blank; Karen Becker; Rupert Langer; Wilko Weichert; Wilfried Roth; Leila Sisic; Annika Stange; Dirk Jäger; Markus Büchler; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.