Literature DB >> 28918544

Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy.

Rupert Langer1, Karen Becker2.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy has been successfully introduced in the treatment of locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly esophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers. The effects of preoperative chemo- or radiochemotherapy can be determined by histopathological investigation of the resection specimen following this treatment. Frequent histological findings after neoadjuvant therapy include various amounts of residual tumor, inflammation, resorptive changes with infiltrates of foamy histiocytes, foreign body reactions, and scarry fibrosis. Several tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, which aim to categorize the amount of regressive changes after cytotoxic treatment in primary tumor sites, have been proposed for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas. These systems primarily refer to the amount of therapy-induced fibrosis in relation to the residual tumor (e.g., the Mandard, Dworak, or AJCC systems) or the estimated percentage of residual tumor in relation to the previous tumor site (e.g., the Becker, Rödel, or Rectal Cancer Regression Grading systems). TRGs provide valuable prognostic information, as in most cases, complete or subtotal tumor regression after neoadjuvant treatment is associated with better patient outcomes. This review describes the typical histopathological findings after neoadjuvant treatment, discusses the most commonly used TRG systems for gastroesophageal and rectal carcinomas, addresses the limitations and critical issues of tumor regression grading in these tumors, and describes the clinical impact of TRG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Gastric cancer; Histopathology; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer; Tumor regression grading

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28918544     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2232-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  71 in total

1.  Excellent interobserver agreement on grading the extent of residual carcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation in esophageal and esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a reliable predictor for patient outcome.

Authors:  Tsung-Teh Wu; Lucian R Chirieac; Susan C Abraham; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Huamin Wang; Asif Rashid; Arlene M Correa; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani; Stephen G Swisher
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Peter Martus; Thomas Papadoupolos; Laszlo Füzesi; Martin Klimpfinger; Rainer Fietkau; Torsten Liersch; Werner Hohenberger; Rudolf Raab; Rolf Sauer; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The clinical impact of histopathologic response assessment by residual tumor cell quantification in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Björn L D M Brücher; Karen Becker; Florian Lordick; Ulrich Fink; Mario Sarbia; Hubert Stein; Raymonde Busch; Frank Zimmermann; Michael Molls; Heinz Höfler; Jörg R Siewert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A multifactorial histopathologic score for the prediction of prognosis of resected esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Karen Becker; Inti Zlobec; Ralf Gertler; Leila Sisic; Markus Büchler; Florian Lordick; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Wilko Weichert; Heinz Höfler; Marcus Feith; Katja Ott
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03.

Authors:  Mark S Roh; Linda H Colangelo; Michael J O'Connell; Greg Yothers; Melvin Deutsch; Carmen J Allegra; Morton S Kahlenberg; Luis Baez-Diaz; Carol S Ursiny; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Determination of the optimal cutoff percentage of residual tumors to define the pathological response rate for gastric cancer treated with preoperative therapy (JCOG1004-A).

Authors:  Kenichi Nakamura; Takeshi Kuwata; Tadakazu Shimoda; Junki Mizusawa; Hiroshi Katayama; Ryoji Kushima; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takeshi Sano; Mitsuru Sasako; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation.

Authors:  Hak-Mien Quah; Joanne F Chou; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Deborah Schrag; Leonard B Saltz; Karyn A Goodman; Bruce D Minsky; W Douglas Wong; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Tumour regression grade (TRG) analyses in patients with resectable gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Khaleel R Fareed; Mohammad Ilyas; Philip V Kaye; Irshad N Soomro; Dileep N Lobo; Simon L Parsons; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Prognostic significance of partial tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yen-Chien Lee; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Jen-Pin Chuang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  22 in total

1.  Reply to the letter "How to standardize the evaluation of tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy?" by Dr. Nasierowska-Guttmejer and Dr. Szawlowski, VIAR-D-18-00181.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Karen Becker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic value of pathological lymph node status and primary tumour regression grading following neoadjuvant chemotherapy - results from the MRC OE02 oesophageal cancer trial.

Authors:  Nasser Davarzani; Gordon G A Hutchins; Nicholas P West; Lindsay C Hewitt; Matthew Nankivell; David Cunningham; William H Allum; Elizabeth Smyth; Nicola Valeri; Ruth E Langley; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  White blood cell and cell-free DNA analyses for detection of residual disease in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Leal; Nicole C T van Grieken; Doreen N Palsgrove; Jillian Phallen; Jamie E Medina; Carolyn Hruban; Mark A M Broeckaert; Valsamo Anagnostou; Vilmos Adleff; Daniel C Bruhm; Jenna V Canzoniero; Jacob Fiksel; Marianne Nordsmark; Fabienne A R M Warmerdam; Henk M W Verheul; Dick Johan van Spronsen; Laurens V Beerepoot; Maud M Geenen; Johanneke E A Portielje; Edwin P M Jansen; Johanna van Sandick; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Donald L van der Peet; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij; Remond Fijneman; Robert B Scharpf; Gerrit A Meijer; Annemieke Cats; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Significance of tumour regression in lymph node metastases of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Daniel Reim; Alexander Novotny; Helmut Friess; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Wilko Weichert; Katja Ott; Bastian Dislich; Sylvie Lorenzen; Karen Becker; Rupert Langer
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2020-05-13

5.  Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hoendervangers; J P M Burbach; M M Lacle; M Koopman; W M U van Grevenstein; M P W Intven; H M Verkooijen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The value of restaging CT following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. A population-based study.

Authors:  Alina Desiree Sandø; Reidun Fougner; Jon Erik Grønbech; Erling Audun Bringeland
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Delta-radiomics and response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer-a multicenter study of GIRCG (Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer).

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Letizia Di Giacomo; Giulio Bagnacci; Valerio Nardone; Francesco Gentili; Gabriele Lucii; Paolo Tini; Daniele Marrelli; Paolo Morgagni; Gianni Mura; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Frida Pittiani; Luca Volterrani; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

8.  Targeted Sequencing Analysis of Matched Cell-Free DNA and White Blood Cells: A Facile Method for Detection of Residual Disease in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Feiyu Diao
Journal:  Glob Med Genet       Date:  2020-08-31

9.  Impact of Tumor Regression Grade as a Major Prognostic Factor in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Proposal for a Modified Staging System.

Authors:  Changhoon Song; Joo-Hyun Chung; Sung-Bum Kang; Duck-Woo Kim; Heung-Kwon Oh; Hye Seung Lee; Jin Won Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Encapsulating fibrosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is correlated with outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yoko Matsuda; Yosuke Inoue; Makiko Hiratsuka; Shoji Kawakatsu; Tomio Arai; Kiyoshi Matsueda; Akio Saiura; Yutaka Takazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.