Literature DB >> 22129513

Chemosensory responsiveness to ethanol and its individual sensory components in alcohol-preferring, alcohol-nonpreferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Susan M Brasser1, Bryant C Silbaugh, Myles J Ketchum, Jeffrey J Olney, Christian H Lemon.   

Abstract

Alcohol activates orosensory circuits that project to motivationally relevant limbic forebrain areas that control appetite, feeding and drinking. To date, limited data exists regarding the contribution of chemosensory-derived ethanol reinforcement to ethanol preference and consumption. Measures of taste reactivity to intra-orally infused ethanol have not found differences in initial orofacial responses to alcohol between alcohol-preferring (P) and alcohol-non-preferring (NP) genetically selected rat lines. Yet, in voluntary intake tests, P rats prefer highly concentrated ethanol upon initial exposure, suggesting an early sensory-mediated attraction. Here, we directly compared self-initiated chemosensory responding for alcohol and prototypic sweet, bitter and oral trigeminal stimuli among selectively bred P, NP and non-selected Wistar (WI) outbred lines to determine whether differential sensory responsiveness to ethanol and its putative sensory components are phenotypically associated with genetically influenced alcohol preference. Rats were tested for immediate short-term lick responses to alcohol (3-40%), sucrose (0.01-1 M), quinine (0.01-3 mM) and capsaicin (0.003-1 mM) in a brief-access assay designed to index orosensory-guided behavior. P rats exhibited elevated short-term lick responses to both alcohol and sucrose relative to NP and WI lines across a broad range of concentrations of each stimulus and in the absence of blood alcohol levels that would produce significant post-absorptive effects. There was no consistent relationship between genetically mediated alcohol preference and orosensory avoidance of quinine or capsaicin. These data indicate that enhanced initial chemosensory attraction to ethanol and sweet stimuli are phenotypes associated with genetic alcohol preference and are considered within the framework of downstream activation of oral appetitive reward circuits.
© 2011 The Authors, Addiction Biology © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22129513      PMCID: PMC3288312          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00415.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Biol        ISSN: 1355-6215            Impact factor:   4.280


  45 in total

1.  The relative affective potency of glycine, L-serine and sucrose as assessed by a brief-access taste test in inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  [Response of chorda tympani fibers of the rat to pungent spices and irritants in pungent spices (author's transl)].

Authors:  Y Okuni
Journal:  Shikwa Gakuho       Date:  1977-09

3.  Sweet preferences and analgesia during childhood: effects of family history of alcoholism and depression.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; M Yanina Pepino; Sara M Lehmann-Castor; Lauren M Yourshaw
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Ethanol elicits and potentiates nociceptor responses via the vanilloid receptor-1.

Authors:  M Trevisani; D Smart; M J Gunthorpe; M Tognetto; M Barbieri; B Campi; S Amadesi; J Gray; J C Jerman; S J Brough; D Owen; G D Smith; A D Randall; S Harrison; A Bianchi; J B Davis; P Geppetti
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Conditioned taste aversion using four different means to deliver sucrose to rats.

Authors:  Jun Yamamoto; Nadine Fresquet; Guy Sandner
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-03

6.  Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat.

Authors:  Andras Hajnal; Gerard P Smith; Ralph Norgren
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Dopamine activity in the nucleus accumbens during consummatory phases of oral ethanol self-administration.

Authors:  William M Doyon; Jennifer L York; Laurea M Diaz; Herman H Samson; Cristine L Czachowski; Rueben A Gonzales
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Family history of alcoholism and response to sweets.

Authors:  Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy; James C Garbutt; Elena Khalitov
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Differential responding for brain stimulation reward and sucrose in high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rats.

Authors:  James E Woods; Peter F McKay; Jacob Masters; Regat Seyoum; Annabel Chen; Lorie La Duff; Michael J Lewis; Harry L June
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Alcohol activates a sucrose-responsive gustatory neural pathway.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; Susan M Brasser; David V Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  12 in total

1.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Cocaine decreases saccharin preference without altering sweet taste sensitivity.

Authors:  Jennifer K Roebber; Sari Izenwasser; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Differential neural representation of oral ethanol by central taste-sensitive neurons in ethanol-preferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon; David M Wilson; Susan M Brasser
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The fine temporal structure of the rat licking pattern: what causes the variabiliy in the interlick intervals and how is it affected by the drinking solution?

Authors:  Xiong Bin Lin; Dwight R Pierce; Kim Edward Light; Abdallah Hayar
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Alcohol-preferring P rats exhibit aversion-resistant drinking of alcohol adulterated with quinine.

Authors:  Nicholas M Timme; David Linsenbardt; Maureen Timm; Taylor Galbari; Ethan Cornwell; Christopher Lapish
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.405

6.  Genetics of gene expression characterizes response to selective breeding for alcohol preference.

Authors:  P L Hoffman; L M Saba; S Flink; N J Grahame; K Kechris; B Tabakoff
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Brief Exposures to the Taste of Ethanol (EtOH) and Quinine Promote Subsequent Acceptance of EtOH in a Paradigm that Minimizes Postingestive Consequences.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 8.  Alcohol sensory processing and its relevance for ingestion.

Authors:  Susan M Brasser; Norma Castro; Brian Feretic
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-10-07

9.  Using Animal Models to Determine the Role of Gustatory Neural Input in the Control of Ingestive Behavior and the Maintenance of Body Weight.

Authors:  Dana L Ciullo; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 1.323

Review 10.  Targeting central melanocortin receptors: a promising novel approach for treating alcohol abuse disorders.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olney; Montserrat Navarro; Todd E Thiele
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.