Literature DB >> 11897266

Conditioned taste aversion using four different means to deliver sucrose to rats.

Jun Yamamoto1, Nadine Fresquet, Guy Sandner.   

Abstract

A solution of sucrose either to be drunk from a drinking tube-self-drinking procedure (SD)-or perfused intraorally as a consequence of nose-pokes-self-administration procedure (SA)-or perfused as a consequence of licking an empty tube (LA)-was paired with an LiCl-induced malaise in rats. The effects were compared to those of a procedure consisting of intraoral administration (IO) of sucrose not contingent to any specific action of the rat. Similar levels of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) were obtained but extinction in the IO procedure was quicker than in the SA procedure, which was itself quicker than in the SD procedure. Extinctions in the IO and LA procedures resembled one another and were quicker than in the SD procedure. A step towards deciding between several explanatory hypotheses of these differences was made by conducting two more experiments. The third experiment was based on reinstatement, or not, of the conditioning procedure for the test after standard IO extinction. CTA was produced only when SD was used both at conditioning and test. A fourth experiment was based on latent inhibition where the procedure was changed, or not, between preexposure and conditioning. Latent inhibition was absent only when the rats had been preexposed to sucrose with the SA procedure and conditioned with the SD procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11897266     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00671-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  Latent inhibition of conditioned disgust reactions in rats.

Authors:  Matías López; Patricia Gasalla; Mercedes Vega; Cheryl L Limebeer; Erin M Rock; Katharine J Tuerke; Holly Bedard; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Extinction of a saccharin-lithium association: assessment by consumption and taste reactivity.

Authors:  Raúl Cantora; Matías López; Luis Aguado; Shadna Rana; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Amount of training and cue-evoked taste-reactivity responding in reinforcer devaluation.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Heather Lasseter; Isha Agarwal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

4.  Nonreinforced flavor exposure attenuates the effects of conditioned taste aversion on both flavor consumption and cue palatability.

Authors:  Dominic Michael Dwyer; Patricia Gasalla; Matías López
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Chemosensory responsiveness to ethanol and its individual sensory components in alcohol-preferring, alcohol-nonpreferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Authors:  Susan M Brasser; Bryant C Silbaugh; Myles J Ketchum; Jeffrey J Olney; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  A comparison between taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions induced by ethanol and lithium chloride in preweanling rats.

Authors:  Carlos Arias; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.