Literature DB >> 14634489

Family history of alcoholism and response to sweets.

Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy1, James C Garbutt, Elena Khalitov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between a hedonic response to sweet tastes and a propensity to excessive alcohol drinking is supported by both animal and human studies. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the genetic risk for alcoholism as measured by a paternal history of alcoholism in young social drinkers is associated with sweet-liking, defined as rating the strongest offered sucrose solution (i.e., 0.83 M) as the most palatable during the standard sweet test.
METHODS: Participants were 163 subjects (39% male) without a lifetime history of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence. Eighty-one subjects had a paternal history of alcoholism (FH+), and 82 did not (FH-). Each subject rated a series of sucrose solutions for intensity of sweetness and palatability. Subjects were categorized as sweet-likers if they rated the highest sucrose concentration as the most pleasurable.
RESULTS: The estimated odds of being a sweet-liker were 2.5 times higher for FH+ than for FH- subjects. FH+ subjects disliked the tastes of the two weakest offered sucrose concentrations (0.05 and 0.10 M), whereas FH- subjects reported these tastes to be neutral.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the hypothesis that sweet-liking is associated with a genetic vulnerability to alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634489     DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000093739.05809.DD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  36 in total

1.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Effects of cigarette smoking and family history of alcoholism on sweet taste perception and food cravings in women.

Authors:  Marta Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  A preliminary study of the human brain response to oral sucrose and its association with recent drinking.

Authors:  David A Kareken; Mario Dzemidzic; Brandon G Oberlin; William J A Eiler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Exploration of food addiction in pediatric patients: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Lisa J Merlo; Courtney Klingman; Toree H Malasanos; Janet H Silverstein
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.702

5.  Brain reward region responsivity of adolescents with and without parental substance use disorders.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-10-14

6.  Intact Hedonic Responses to Sweet Tastes in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Cara R Damiano; Joseph Aloi; Caley Burrus; James C Garbutt; Alexei B Kampov-Polevoy; Gabriel S Dichter
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2014-03

7.  Amphetamine primes enhanced motivation toward uncertain choices in rats with genetic alcohol preference.

Authors:  Ville Oinio; Mikko Sundström; Pia Bäckström; Johanna Uhari-Väänänen; Kalervo Kiianmaa; Atso Raasmaja; Petteri Piepponen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Sweet liking phenotype, alcohol craving and response to naltrexone treatment in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  James C Garbutt; Michael Osborne; Robert Gallop; John Barkenbus; Kathy Grace; Meghan Cody; Barbara Flannery; Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 9.  High drinking in the dark mice: a genetic model of drinking to intoxication.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.405

10.  Milk consumption during adolescence decreases alcohol drinking in adulthood.

Authors:  Jerry P Pian; Jose R Criado; Brendan M Walker; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.