Literature DB >> 22126973

Kinematics of running at different slopes and speeds.

Johnny Padulo1, Giuseppe Annino, Gian M Migliaccio, Stefano Dʼottavio, József Tihanyi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the influence of the combination of different running speeds and slopes based on main kinematic parameters in both groups of elite (RE) and amateur (RA) marathon runners. All subjects performed various tests on a treadmill at 0, 2, and 7% slopes at different speeds: 3.89, 4.17, 4.44, 4.72, and 5.00 m·s. A high speed digital camera, 210 Hz, has been used to record; Dartfish 5.5Pro has been used to perform a 2D video analysis. Step length (SL), step frequency (SF), flight time (FT), and contact time (CT) were determined and used for comparison. SL, SF, and FT parameters increased, and CT parameter decreased as speed increased. As slopes increased, SL and FT decreased and SF increased in both groups and only CT decreased in RE, whereas in RA, it increased. Data were fitted to the linear regression line (R > 0.95). The 2 groups were significantly different (p < 0.05) in FT, SL, and SF at all speeds in level running. A significant difference between the 2 groups was found in FT at 2 and 7% slopes at all speeds (p < 0.05). Percentage alterations in all variables were greater in the RA group. In conclusion, the choice of optimum SL and SF, through efficient running can be maintained, is influenced not only by speed but also by slopes. Elite runners perform more efficiently than amateur runners who have less experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22126973     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231aafa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  15 in total

Review 1.  Walking and running on treadmill: the standard criteria for kinematics studies.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Karim Chamari; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

2.  An evaluation of the endoscopic surgical skills assessment using a video analysis software program.

Authors:  Takahisa Suzuki; Hiroyuki Egi; Minoru Hattori; Masakazu Tokunaga; Hiroyuki Sawada; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of Level and Graded Treadmill Tests to Evaluate Endurance Mountain Runners.

Authors:  Pascal Balducci; Michel Clémençon; Baptiste Morel; Géraud Quiniou; Damien Saboul; Christophe A Hautier
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  The metabolic costs of walking and running up a 30-degree incline: implications for vertical kilometer foot races.

Authors:  Amanda Louise Ryan Ortiz; Nicola Giovanelli; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effect of uphill stride manipulation on race walking gait.

Authors:  J Padulo
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.806

6.  Validity of the MarkWiiR for kinematic analysis during walking and running gaits.

Authors:  J Padulo; S Vando; K Chamari; A Chaouachi; D Bagno; F Pizzolato
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 2.806

Review 7.  Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes.

Authors:  Ana Marchena-Rodriguez; Ana Belen Ortega-Avila; Pablo Cervera-Garvi; David Cabello-Manrique; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Classification of higher- and lower-mileage runners based on running kinematics.

Authors:  Christian A Clermont; Angkoon Phinyomark; Sean T Osis; Reed Ferber
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 7.179

9.  A paradigm of uphill running.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Douglas Powell; Raffaele Milia; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feel your stride and find your preferred running speed.

Authors:  Thibault Lussiana; Cyrille Gindre
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.