Literature DB >> 25294543

An evaluation of the endoscopic surgical skills assessment using a video analysis software program.

Takahisa Suzuki1, Hiroyuki Egi, Minoru Hattori, Masakazu Tokunaga, Hiroyuki Sawada, Hideki Ohdan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: Recently, the endoscopic surgical skills of surgeons have become a focus of many investigators and society as a whole. Hence, the importance of the training and education programs used to ensure safer endoscopic surgery has been gradually increasing. We developed our own motion analysis system called the HUESAD, and already demonstrated its construct validity. In this study, we verified that another motion analysis system (which uses the Dartfish Software program) could assess surgeons' endoscopic surgical skills.
METHODS: Experts (who had performed more than 100 laparoscopic surgeries) and novices (who had no experience performing laparoscopic surgery) were recruited for this study. The task was suturing in a dry box trainer. The time and the locus tracing of both sides' needle holders were analyzed using the new video analysis system (Dartfish Software).
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between the experts and novices in all three variables assessed (task time: p = 0.0011, the locus tracing of the left sides' needle holders: p = 0.0011, the locus tracing of the right sides' needle holders: p = 0.0011).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the results of the motion analysis by the Dartfish Software were well correlated with the surgeon's skill level.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294543     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3863-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

1.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model.

Authors:  D J Anastakis; G Regehr; R K Reznick; M Cusimano; J Murnaghan; M Brown; C Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; F Bello; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Derek T Woodrum; Pamela B Andreatta; Rajani K Yellamanchilli; Lauren Feryus; Paul G Gauger; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator.

Authors:  Aimin Zhang; Michael Hünerbein; Yiyang Dai; Peter M Schlag; Siegfried Beller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Scientific assessment of endoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Egi; Masazumi Okajima; Tomohiro Kawahara; Masanori Yoshimitsu; Daisuke Sumitani; Masakazu Tokunaga; Haruka Takeda; Toshiyuki Itamoto; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.442

6.  Approaching time is important for assessment of endoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Masakazu Tokunaga; Hiroyuki Egi; Minoru Hattori; Masanori Yoshimitsu; Daisuke Sumitani; Tomohiro Kawahara; Masazumi Okajima; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 7.  Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill?

Authors:  John D Mason; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluating the correlation between the HUESAD and OSATS scores: concurrent validity study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Egi; Masakazu Tokunaga; Minoru Hattori; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.442

9.  Three types of kinematic feedback and the execution of the hang power clean.

Authors:  Joshua A Rucci; Phillip D Tomporowski
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Wendy Babidge; John Field; Meryl Altree; Nicholas Marlow; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  A computer vision technique for automated assessment of surgical performance using surgeons' console-feed videos.

Authors:  Amir Baghdadi; Ahmed A Hussein; Youssef Ahmed; Lora A Cavuoto; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Video content analysis of surgical procedures.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Feasibility of expert and crowd-sourced review of intraoperative video for quality improvement of intracorporeal urinary diversion during robotic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Mitchell G Goldenberg; Jamal Nabhani; Christopher J D Wallis; Sameer Chopra; Andrew J Hung; Anne Schuckman; Hooman Djaladat; Siamak Daneshmand; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Raj Satkunasivam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.