Literature DB >> 27274660

Comparison of Level and Graded Treadmill Tests to Evaluate Endurance Mountain Runners.

Pascal Balducci1, Michel Clémençon1, Baptiste Morel1, Géraud Quiniou1, Damien Saboul2, Christophe A Hautier1.   

Abstract

Mountain endurance running has increased in popularity in recent years. Thus the aim of the present study was to determine if maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and energy cost of running (Cr) measured during level and uphill running are associated. Ten high level male endurance mountain runners performed three maximal oxygen uptake tests at three slope conditions (0, 12.5 and 25%). Metabolic data, step frequency (SF) and step length (SL) were recorded. No significant differences were found in VO2max (63.29 (±3.84), 63.97 (±3.54) and 63.70 (±3.58) mlO2/kg(-1)/min(-1)) or associated metabolic data at 0, 12.5 and 25% slope respectively. High intra-individual correlations were found between metabolic data measured in the three conditions. The energy cost of running was significantly different between slopes (0.192 (±0.01), 0.350 (±0.029) and 0.516 (±0.035) mlO2/kg(-1)/min(-1), p < 0.01), 0, 12.5 and 25% respectively. However, Cr0% was not correlated with either Cr25% or Cr12.5% (rs = 0.09 and rs = 0.10), in contrast, Cr25% and Cr12.5% were correlated (rs = 0.78). Step length was positively correlated with speed under the three slope conditions. Step frequency was significantly lower at 25 compared to 12.5 and 0% slope. We found that the maximum aerobic power did not differ between level and graded treadmill tests. However, the increase in Cr on the inclined versus level conditions varied between subjects. None of the measured anthropometric or kinematic variables could explain the higher increase in Cr of some subjects when running uphill. Thus, a short graded (5min at 12.5%) running test should be performed at a submaximal velocity (around 40% of level vVO2max) to enhance understanding of an endurance runner's uphill capability. Key pointsIn elite endurance mountain runners, there is no difference in VO2max values between level and uphill running.In a homogeneous group of mountain runners, uphill Cr is not associated with level Cr.To assess performance potential of endurance mountain runners, a standardized uphill running protocol should be performed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VO2max; energy cost of running; step frequency; uphill running

Year:  2016        PMID: 27274660      PMCID: PMC4879436     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  41 in total

1.  Energy cost of running.

Authors:  R MARGARIA; P CERRETELLI; P AGHEMO; G SASSI
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Energetically optimal stride frequency in running: the effects of incline and decline.

Authors:  Kristine L Snyder; Claire T Farley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  VO2max during horizontal and inclined treadmill running.

Authors:  F W Kasch; J P Wallace; R R Huhn; L A Krogh; P M Hurl
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Validity of the Optogait photoelectric system for the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters.

Authors:  Karin Lienhard; David Schneider; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 5.  Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed.

Authors:  Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Changes in running economy at different intensities following downhill running.

Authors:  Trevor C Chen; Kazunori Nosaka; Ming-Ju Lin; Hsin-Lian Chen; Chang-Jun Wu
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.

Authors:  P Zamparo; R Perini; C Orizio; M Sacher; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

8.  Alterations of Neuromuscular Function after the World's Most Challenging Mountain Ultra-Marathon.

Authors:  Jonas Saugy; Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet; Francis Degache; Federico Schena; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A paradigm of uphill running.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Douglas Powell; Raffaele Milia; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Applying the cost of generating force hypothesis to uphill running.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Paolo Taboga; Rodger Kram
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  12 in total

1.  Level, uphill and downhill running economy values are strongly inter-correlated.

Authors:  Timothy Joseph Breiner; Amanda Louise Ryan Ortiz; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sports and exercise.

Authors:  Ashley Ying-Ying Wong; Samuel Ka-Kin Ling; Lobo Hung-Tak Louie; George Ying-Kan Law; Raymond Chi-Hung So; Daniel Chi-Wo Lee; Forrest Chung-Fai Yau; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-07-28

3.  Physiological Aspects of World Elite Competitive German Winter Sport Athletes.

Authors:  Paul Zimmermann; Jan Wüstenfeld; Lukas Zimmermann; Volker Schöffl; Isabelle Schöffl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Using a novel data resource to explore heart rate during mountain and road running.

Authors:  Andrew Best; Barry Braun
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-04

5.  Does the Running Economy Really Increase after Ultra-Marathons?

Authors:  Gianluca Vernillo; Grégoire P Millet; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Prediction of Performance in a Short Trail Running Race: The Role of Body Composition.

Authors:  José Ramón Alvero-Cruz; Verónica Parent Mathias; Jerónimo Garcia Romero; Margarita Carrillo de Albornoz-Gil; Javier Benítez-Porres; Francisco Javier Ordoñez; Thomas Rosemann; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Muscle Tone and Body Weight Predict Uphill Race Time in Amateur Trail Runners.

Authors:  César Berzosa; Héctor Gutierrez; Pablo Jesús Bascuas; Irela Arbones; Ana Vanessa Bataller-Cervero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Differences between Systems Using Optical and Capacitive Sensors in Treadmill-Based Spatiotemporal Analysis of Level and Sloping Gait.

Authors:  Dimitris Mandalidis; Ioannis Kafetzakis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Economy Values Are Correlated Except on Steep Slopes.

Authors:  Marcel Lemire; Mathieu Falbriard; Kamiar Aminian; Grégoire P Millet; Frédéric Meyer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Athlete's Heart in Elite Biathlon, Nordic Cross-Country and Ski-Mountaineering Athletes: Cardiac Adaptions Determined Using Echocardiographic Data.

Authors:  Paul Zimmermann; Othmar Moser; Max L Eckstein; Jan Wüstenfeld; Volker Schöffl; Lukas Zimmermann; Martin Braun; Isabelle Schöffl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.