| Literature DB >> 22125424 |
Lorraine Pariset1, Marco Mariotti, Maria Gargani, Stephane Joost, Riccardo Negrini, Trinidad Perez, Michael Bruford, Paolo Ajmone Marsan, Alessio Valentini.
Abstract
We employed mtDNA and nuclear SNPs to investigate the genetic diversity of sheep breeds of three countries of the Mediterranean basin: Albania, Greece, and Italy. In total, 154 unique mtDNA haplotypes were detected by means of D-loop sequence analysis. The major nucleotide diversity was observed in Albania. We identified haplogroups, A, B, and C in Albanian and Greek samples, while Italian individuals clustered in groups A and B. In general, the data show a pattern reflecting old migrations that occurred in postneolithic and historical times. PCA analysis on SNP data differentiated breeds with good correspondence to geographical locations. This could reflect geographical isolation, selection operated by local sheep farmers, and different flock management and breed admixture that occurred in the last centuries.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean; SNPs; domestication; mtDNA; sheep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22125424 PMCID: PMC3201683 DOI: 10.1100/2011/186342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Country of origin, breeds, and acronyms used in computations.
| Country | Breed | Acronym |
|---|---|---|
| Albania | Bardhoka | BAR |
|
| ||
| Greece | Kalarritiko | KAL |
|
| ||
| Italy | Bergamasca | BER |
Figure 3First (a) and second (b) components of eigenvectors spatial distribution calculated on mtDNA marker and first (c) and second (d) components calculated on SNPs markers. Background image is GTOPO30, a global digital elevation model (DEM) with a horizontal grid spacing of 30 arc seconds (approximately 1 kilometer) produced by the U.S. Geological Survey's Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS). The line in the map (c) shows the isoline for an eigenvalue of 0. It appears on panel C only because this is the only geographical configuration for which a limit is so obvious. The circle around the RUDA breed shows an isoline for the eigenvalue of 0.03.
Sample size per country (n), number of haplotypes observed (Haplotypes), number of polymorphic sites, mean number of pairwise differences among sequences (pairwise diff.), haplotype diversity (h), and nucleotide diversity (π) are shown.
| Country |
| Haplotypes | Polymorphic sites | Pairwise diff. |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | 93 | 62 | 58 | 4.180 | 0.978 | 0.01007 |
| Greece | 167 | 83 | 73 | 5.934 | 0.934 | 0.01469 |
| Albania | 53 | 37 | 57 | 8.704 | 0.979 | 0.02107 |
Average number of nucleotide differences, D (below), and average number of nucleotide substitutions per site between populations, Dxy [48] (above).
| BER | ALT | LAT | LAN | GDP | BAR | RUD | SHK | KAL | ORI | PIL | KEF | LES | KIM | KAR | SKO | ANO | SFA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BER | ∗ | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.025 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| ALT | 3.908 | ∗ | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.017 | 0.009 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| LAT | 3.728 | 2.93 | ∗ | 0.01 | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.009 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| LAN | 5.079 | 4.425 | 4.279 | ∗ | 0.012 | 0.019 | 0.013 | 0.022 | 0.01 | 0.018 | 0.01 | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.026 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| GDP | 4.632 | 3.906 | 3.756 | 5.134 | ∗ | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.017 | 0.01 | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.024 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| BAR | 7.447 | 6.933 | 6.856 | 8.107 | 7.579 | ∗ | 0.018 | 0.026 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.017 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.016 |
| RUD | 4.612 | 3.95 | 3.7 | 5.245 | 4.711 | 7.647 | ∗ | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.017 | 0.01 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.025 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| SHK | 8.778 | 8.272 | 8.345 | 9.269 | 8.696 | 10.567 | 8.789 | ∗ | 0.02 | 0.025 | 0.02 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.023 | 0.021 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| KAL | 3.712 | 3 | 2.708 | 4.183 | 3.754 | 6.741 | 3.778 | 8.241 | ∗ | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.024 | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| ORI | 7.108 | 6.488 | 6.395 | 7.536 | 7.132 | 9.4 | 7.122 | 10.395 | 6.352 | ∗ | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.029 | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
| PIL | 3.91 | 3.289 | 3.011 | 4.5 | 4.021 | 7.049 | 4.067 | 8.419 | 2.978 | 6.556 | ∗ | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| KEF | 7.349 | 6.861 | 6.832 | 7.853 | 7.319 | 9.804 | 7.475 | 10.306 | 6.757 | 9.486 | 6.971 | ∗ | 0.022 | 0.026 | 0.019 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.016 |
| LES | 7.515 | 7.042 | 6.941 | 8.053 | 7.507 | 10.1 | 7.588 | 10.396 | 6.896 | 9.576 | 7.125 | 9.367 | ∗ | 0.027 | 0.019 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.016 |
| KIM | 10.426 | 10.083 | 10.276 | 10.994 | 10.211 | 12.45 | 10.438 | 11.931 | 10.194 | 12.028 | 10.383 | 11.141 | 11.375 | ∗ | 0.026 | 0.026 | 0.024 | 0.024 |
| KAR | 5.144 | 4.478 | 4.197 | 5.595 | 5.139 | 8.217 | 5.185 | 9.378 | 4.294 | 7.65 | 4.503 | 7.894 | 7.975 | 10.975 | ∗ | 0.012 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| SKO | 4.497 | 3.852 | 3.538 | 4.989 | 4.544 | 7.585 | 4.611 | 8.883 | 3.472 | 7.102 | 3.719 | 7.455 | 7.618 | 10.813 | 4.936 | ∗ | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| ANO | 3.514 | 2.678 | 2.357 | 4.053 | 3.526 | 6.614 | 3.505 | 8.123 | 2.439 | 6.132 | 2.712 | 6.655 | 6.73 | 10.079 | 4.003 | 3.301 | ∗ | 0.006 |
| SFA | 3.768 | 3.164 | 2.878 | 4.266 | 3.801 | 6.698 | 3.834 | 8.015 | 2.906 | 6.266 | 3.182 | 6.658 | 6.77 | 9.757 | 4.284 | 3.596 | 2.643 | ∗ |
Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) with 10,000 permutations.
| Source of variation | Variation (%) | Fixation indices [ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Among regions | 0.90 | FSC: 0.0495 | <0.01 |
| Among breeds/within regions | 4.06 |
| <0.01 |
| Within breeds | 95.04 | FCT: 0.00903 | <0.5 |
Figure 1Neighbour-joining tree based on the 154 mtDNA haplotypes, showing differences among haplogroups and wild sheep (outgroup). Numbers indicate the percentage bootstrap support (10,000 resamplings).
Sequences analysed, number of variable sites (# Var), number of haplotypes (Hap), and percentage of haplotypes in the haplogroups A, B, or C per breed.
| Breed | Sequences | # Var | Hap | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAR | 15 | 43 | 14 | 0.07 | 0.79 | 0.14 |
| RUD | 20 | 35 | 15 | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0 |
| SHK | 18 | 42 | 11 | 0.09 | 0.73 | 0.18 |
| ANO | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KAL | 18 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KAR | 20 | 38 | 14 | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0 |
| KEF | 16 | 31 | 11 | 0.18 | 0.82 | 0 |
| KIM | 8 | 27 | 6 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 0 |
| LES | 16 | 38 | 13 | 0.15 | 0.85 | 0 |
| ORI | 18 | 43 | 13 | 0.08 | 0.84 | 0.08 |
| PIL | 15 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| SFA | 19 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| SKO | 18 | 27 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| ALT | 18 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| BER | 17 | 30 | 12 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 0 |
| GDP | 19 | 32 | 16 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0 |
| LAN | 20 | 41 | 17 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0 |
| LAT | 19 | 17 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Figure 2Geographical distribution of haplogroups, circles are proportional to the number of samples. (green: haplogroup A; purple: haplogroup B; red: haplogroup C).
Pairwise population matrix of Nei's [44], below, and Reynolds' [45], above, genetic distances. Breed codes are as in Table 1.
| BAR | RUD | SHK | ANO | KAL | KAR | KEF | KIM | LES | ORI | PIL | SFA | SKO | ALT | BER | GDP | LAN | LAT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAR | ∗ | 0.060 | 0.046 | 0.065 | 0.052 | 0.054 | 0.055 | 0.104 | 0.110 | 0.117 | 0.083 | 0.061 | 0.070 | 0.107 | 0.103 | 0.167 | 0.121 | 0.055 |
| RUD | 0.018 | ∗ | 0.036 | 0.072 | 0.082 | 0.022 | 0.046 | 0.067 | 0.059 | 0.148 | 0.104 | 0.062 | 0.062 | 0.079 | 0.049 | 0.203 | 0.100 | 0.051 |
| SHK | 0.017 | 0.009 | ∗ | 0.072 | 0.072 | 0.039 | 0.058 | 0.078 | 0.087 | 0.112 | 0.063 | 0.080 | 0.042 | 0.101 | 0.062 | 0.174 | 0.123 | 0.058 |
| ANO | 0.019 | 0.029 | 0.025 | ∗ | 0.086 | 0.055 | 0.075 | 0.109 | 0.096 | 0.147 | 0.103 | 0.045 | 0.098 | 0.128 | 0.085 | 0.247 | 0.122 | 0.073 |
| KAL | 0.014 | 0.019 | 0.023 | 0.023 | ∗ | 0.078 | 0.071 | 0.127 | 0.124 | 0.076 | 0.062 | 0.107 | 0.112 | 0.142 | 0.104 | 0.159 | 0.119 | 0.092 |
| KAR | 0.013 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.020 | 0.013 | ∗ | 0.047 | 0.071 | 0.072 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.057 | 0.060 | 0.087 | 0.048 | 0.216 | 0.102 | 0.054 |
| KEF | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.014 | 0.025 | 0.013 | 0.014 | ∗ | 0.095 | 0.091 | 0.141 | 0.106 | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.089 | 0.091 | 0.248 | 0.124 | 0.058 |
| KIM | 0.034 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.039 | 0.033 | 0.021 | 0.035 | ∗ | 0.081 | 0.154 | 0.134 | 0.107 | 0.115 | 0.102 | 0.100 | 0.241 | 0.157 | 0.075 |
| LES | 0.029 | 0.017 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.028 | 0.021 | 0.030 | 0.028 | ∗ | 0.180 | 0.148 | 0.095 | 0.110 | 0.116 | 0.086 | 0.249 | 0.134 | 0.070 |
| ORI | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.017 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.027 | 0.027 | ∗ | 0.090 | 0.169 | 0.161 | 0.182 | 0.168 | 0.152 | 0.163 | 0.140 |
| PIL | 0.024 | 0.020 | 0.013 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.028 | 0.025 | 0.021 | ∗ | 0.124 | 0.104 | 0.161 | 0.125 | 0.152 | 0.161 | 0.107 |
| SFA | 0.014 | 0.026 | 0.025 | 0.015 | 0.026 | 0.020 | 0.024 | 0.040 | 0.028 | 0.020 | 0.021 | ∗ | 0.098 | 0.140 | 0.097 | 0.253 | 0.122 | 0.067 |
| SKO | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.013 | 0.040 | 0.034 | 0.020 | 0.021 | 0.039 | 0.037 | 0.031 | 0.021 | 0.034 | ∗ | 0.128 | 0.083 | 0.232 | 0.152 | 0.098 |
| ALT | 0.031 | 0.024 | 0.031 | 0.047 | 0.041 | 0.026 | 0.025 | 0.037 | 0.040 | 0.030 | 0.042 | 0.051 | 0.041 | ∗ | 0.119 | 0.226 | 0.132 | 0.073 |
| BER | 0.039 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.035 | 0.028 | 0.019 | 0.036 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.026 | 0.024 | 0.040 | 0.029 | 0.049 | ∗ | 0.233 | 0.070 | 0.083 |
| GDP | 0.077 | 0.062 | 0.077 | 0.096 | 0.086 | 0.068 | 0.079 | 0.089 | 0.083 | 0.076 | 0.083 | 0.081 | 0.094 | 0.067 | 0.082 | ∗ | 0.212 | 0.173 |
| LAN | 0.053 | 0.045 | 0.058 | 0.054 | 0.047 | 0.044 | 0.053 | 0.076 | 0.061 | 0.037 | 0.058 | 0.051 | 0.069 | 0.057 | 0.032 | 0.078 | ∗ | 0.099 |
| LAT | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.030 | 0.024 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.021 | 0.034 | 0.026 | 0.035 | 0.064 | 0.048 | ∗ |
Figure 4PCA analysis of the breeds assessed by SNP markers. The first three axes, cumulatively explaining 48.87% of the total inertia, were considered.