Literature DB >> 24928765

Influence of the cardiac cycle on time-intensity curves using multislice dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion.

Alain Nchimi1, Isabelle Mancini, Thomas K Y Broussaud.   

Abstract

Flow and pressure variations cause potential changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity across the cardiac cycle. Nevertheless, cardiac dynamic contrast-enhanced (perfusion) MRI is performed and analyzed regardless of the cardiac phase. We investigate whether the cardiac phase impacts myocardial and left ventricle (LV) cavity time intensity curves (TICs) at rest and during vasodilatation. Fifteen healthy volunteers (seven females, eight males; mean age: 32.5 ± 9.3 years; age range: 19-49 years) were included in this prospective study. They underwent four separate short-axis multislice (apical, mid and basal) LV perfusion MRI, with different electrocardiogram-triggering during normal vasotone and adenosine-stress. TIC parameters were extracted from the myocardium and the LV cavity. General linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate their variability according to vasotone, cardiac phase and slice-position. Maximal enhancement and normalized Steepest slopes were higher at stress than at rest (p values <0.001). A similar trend towards higher inflow was shown on systole versus diastole in the LV cavity and diastole versus systole in the myocardium (p < 0.05).These TIC parameters were slice-position dependent, as the inflow decreased from the base to the apex in the LV, and peaked on the mid-slice for the myocardium. There are significant variability of both the LV and the myocardial TICs, with respect to the cardiac cycle phase and the slice position where imaging actually takes place. These appeal to measurement standardization for a better intra- and inter-study reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928765     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0466-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

1.  Reduction of transient signal oscillations in true-FISP using a linear flip angle series magnetization preparation.

Authors:  Vibhas S Deshpande; Yiu-Cho Chung; Qiang Zhang; Steven M Shea; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Cyclic variation of T1 in the myocardium at 3 T.

Authors:  Janaka Wansapura; William Gottliebson; Eric Crotty; Robert Fleck
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Reproducibility of first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Abdulghani M Larghat; Neil Maredia; John Biglands; John P Greenwood; Stephen G Ball; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Myocardial dynamic contrast-enhanced Mr: vascular diseases and beyond.

Authors:  A Nchimi; J Djekic; B Raskinet; A Morar; I Mancini; Th K Y Broussaud; O Ghekiere
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

6.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  G A Diamond; J S Forrester
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Phasic coronary blood flow velocity in intramural and epicardial coronary arteries.

Authors:  W M Chilian; M L Marcus
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 8.  Cardiac MRI in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Masaki Ishida; Shingo Kato; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.993

9.  Regional heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion in healthy human myocardium: assessment with magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Olaf M Muehling; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Prasad Panse; Andrey Zenovich; Betsy V Wilson; Robert F Wilson; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Mapping cyclic change of regional myocardial blood volume using steady-state susceptibility effect of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ed X Wu; Haiying Tang; Kelvin K Wong; Jie Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Semi-Quantitative Versus Visual Analysis of Adenosine Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Intermediate-Grade Coronary Artery Stenosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Olivier Ghekiere; Jean-Nicolas Dacher; Willem Dewilde; Wilfired Cools; Paul Dendale; Alain Nchimi
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance throughout the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Ananth Kidambi; Akhlaque Uddin; Steven Sourbron; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Impact of the Choice of Native T1 in Pixelwise Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification.

Authors:  Corina Kräuter; Ursula Reiter; Clemens Reiter; Volha Nizhnikava; Albrecht Schmidt; Rudolf Stollberger; Michael Fuchsjäger; Gert Reiter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.813

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.